IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] WG last call: draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation

"wangjj@centec.com" <wangjj@centec.com> Tue, 30 April 2024 10:14 UTC

Return-Path: <wangjj@centec.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6727CC14F61C for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 03:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.884
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.884 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zFj9f890lFXz for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 03:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ssh247.corpemail.net (ssh247.corpemail.net [210.51.61.247]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E57E3C14F61A for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 03:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ssh247.corpemail.net by ssh247.corpemail.net ((D)) with ASMTP id XHP00112 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:14:12 +0800
Received: from vm-mkt-038 ([10.11.5.24]) (envelope-sender <wangjj@centec.com>) by 192.168.25.7 with ESMTP for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:08:16 +0800
X-WM-Sender: wangjj@centec.com
X-Originating-IP: 10.11.5.24
X-WM-AuthFlag: YES
X-WM-AuthUser: wangjj@centec.com
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:10:59 +0800
From: "wangjj@centec.com" <wangjj@centec.com>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.20.269[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <20240430181059472995700@centec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart487218681224_=----"
Sender: "wangjj@centec.com" <wangjj@centec.com>
tUid: 202443018141281e4267efae9f1efc47137a2a2828c96
X-Abuse-Reports-To: service@corp-email.com
Abuse-Reports-To: service@corp-email.com
X-Complaints-To: service@corp-email.com
X-Report-Abuse-To: service@corp-email.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/lPXw8Xw5gnaFesrsprCq6MuiWR8>
Subject: Re: [mpls] WG last call: draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:14:23 -0000

Dear WG ,
I support progressing this draft to publication, from the perspective of a network chip vendor.
The document itself has been reviewed, and we have implemented this draft in Centec network products. 

Best regards



Junjie Wang
Suzhou Centec Communications Co., Ltd.
Web：www.centec.com

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status