Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident
"George Swallow (swallow)" <swallow@cisco.com> Fri, 13 November 2015 21:13 UTC
Return-Path: <swallow@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319E21B31E6; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:13:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XAIj3vGGR0Ao; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:13:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 673981B31FB; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:13:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=16266; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1447449217; x=1448658817; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=el3fvPSJK2vKBY6i8RMyqxyrOI/X4AvjmPUFD/57eY0=; b=kDNuazBVjJ9zAxai3WHGr7YdXCFbZRsgXQu1iT4BM+s5mnr/4Vpcsdtk ZR99EAU4cYribRVYcGxnfrO/W204948jPAxn/XhDbE041i7DQVZdjKLI/ F1SbxFMnu+DWj98O4wIkd9YKmK78kOQeu1rSB1Ba4ZL5o4/k7p3j/X0xB k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AsAgBzUUZW/4wNJK1egm5NU28GvkYBDYFkIYVvAoE+OBQBAQEBAQEBgQqENAEBAQRuBgUQAgEIEQMBAigHIREUCQgCBAENBRuHfgMSDbtHDYRXAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFASLUoJTgVYBEAIBPg2EMQWNVIUTg2EBhRyGFYF1gVuEQI5Xh1IBHwEBQoQEcoQ2gQcBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,289,1444694400"; d="scan'208,217";a="208113410"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2015 21:13:36 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com (xch-aln-016.cisco.com [173.36.7.26]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tADLDaXJ004744 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 13 Nov 2015 21:13:36 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-016.cisco.com (173.36.7.26) by XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com (173.36.7.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:13:35 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-016.cisco.com ([173.36.7.26]) by XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com ([173.36.7.26]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:13:35 -0600
From: "George Swallow (swallow)" <swallow@cisco.com>
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident
Thread-Index: AQHRHWc1gTGSbOzvH02ylgQw7NT8Vp6ZIsSAgAA7soCAARcHgA==
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 21:13:35 +0000
Message-ID: <D26BBC9B.127D06%swallow@cisco.com>
References: <DM2PR05MB57378D0A32395685243A25EA5120@DM2PR05MB573.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <5644E1F7.5030404@gmail.com> <3A35CADE-3476-4EDB-BE90-8D1D2090E87C@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A35CADE-3476-4EDB-BE90-8D1D2090E87C@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.7.151005
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.212.3]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D26BBC9B127D06swallowciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/lQ1SlE0AQCD8DhCkmBqSBK73FuQ>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 21:13:40 -0000
Same here. George From: Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@cisco.com<mailto:cpignata@cisco.com>> Date: Thursday, November 12, 2015 at 6:34 PM To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com<mailto:stewart.bryant@gmail.com>> Cc: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net<mailto:rcallon@juniper.net>>, "mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>" <mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>>, "Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" <stbryant@cisco.com<mailto:stbryant@cisco.com>>, Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com<mailto:mach.chen@huawei.com>>, "lizhenbin@huawei.com<mailto:lizhenbin@huawei.com>" <lizhenbin@huawei.com<mailto:lizhenbin@huawei.com>>, Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com<mailto:gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-chairs@ietf.org>" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-chairs@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident Ditto. Thanks, - Carlos. On Nov 12, 2015, at 2:01 PM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com<mailto:stewart.bryant@gmail.com>> wrote: As a requirements draft, I know of no IPR per se, but the reader may be drawn to the solutions posited in the SFL drafts which do have disclosed IPR. The reference in the text to the need to implement a solution to draft-tempia-ippm-p3m-02<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tempia-ippm-p3m-02> by definition brings in it to play the IPR disclosed against that draft. - Stewart On 12/11/2015 16:28, Ross Callon wrote: Working Group, The authors of draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident have told us that the draft is ready to be polled to see if we have consensus to make it a working group document. Before we start the adoption poll we will do an IPR poll. This mail starts the IPR poll. Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). Currently there are no IPR disclosures that relate to this document. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thanks, Ross (as MPLS WG co-chair)
- [mpls] IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident Ross Callon
- Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ide… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ide… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ide… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ide… Mach Chen
- [mpls] R: IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident Fioccola Giuseppe
- Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ide… George Swallow (swallow)
- [mpls] 答复: IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ide… Lizhenbin
- Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ide… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ide… Stewart Bryant