Return-Path: X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319E21B31E6; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:13:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.51 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XAIj3vGGR0Ao; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:13:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 673981B31FB; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:13:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=16266; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1447449217; x=1448658817; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=el3fvPSJK2vKBY6i8RMyqxyrOI/X4AvjmPUFD/57eY0=; b=kDNuazBVjJ9zAxai3WHGr7YdXCFbZRsgXQu1iT4BM+s5mnr/4Vpcsdtk ZR99EAU4cYribRVYcGxnfrO/W204948jPAxn/XhDbE041i7DQVZdjKLI/ F1SbxFMnu+DWj98O4wIkd9YKmK78kOQeu1rSB1Ba4ZL5o4/k7p3j/X0xB k=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AsAgBzUUZW/4wNJK1egm5NU28GvkYBD?= =?us-ascii?q?YFkIYVvAoE+OBQBAQEBAQEBgQqENAEBAQRuBgUQAgEIEQMBAigHIREUCQgCBAE?= =?us-ascii?q?NBRuHfgMSDbtHDYRXAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFASLUoJTgVYBEAIBP?= =?us-ascii?q?g2EMQWNVIUTg2EBhRyGFYF1gVuEQI5Xh1IBHwEBQoQEcoQ2gQcBAQE?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,289,1444694400"; d="scan'208,217";a="208113410" Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2015 21:13:36 +0000 Received: from XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com (xch-aln-016.cisco.com [173.36.7.26]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tADLDaXJ004744 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 13 Nov 2015 21:13:36 GMT Received: from xch-aln-016.cisco.com (173.36.7.26) by XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com (173.36.7.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:13:35 -0600 Received: from xch-aln-016.cisco.com ([173.36.7.26]) by XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com ([173.36.7.26]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:13:35 -0600 From: "George Swallow (swallow)" To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" , Stewart Bryant Thread-Topic: IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident Thread-Index: AQHRHWc1gTGSbOzvH02ylgQw7NT8Vp6ZIsSAgAA7soCAARcHgA== Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 21:13:35 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5644E1F7.5030404@gmail.com> <3A35CADE-3476-4EDB-BE90-8D1D2090E87C@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <3A35CADE-3476-4EDB-BE90-8D1D2090E87C@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.7.151005 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.116.212.3] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D26BBC9B127D06swallowciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" , "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" , Ross Callon Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 21:13:40 -0000 --_000_D26BBC9B127D06swallowciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Same here. George From: Carlos Pignataro > Date: Thursday, November 12, 2015 at 6:34 PM To: Stewart Bryant > Cc: Ross Callon >, "mpls@ie= tf.org" >, "Stewa= rt Bryant (stbryant)" >, Mach= Chen >, "lizhenbin@huawe= i.com" >, Gregory Mirsky >, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" > Subject: Re: IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident Ditto. Thanks, - Carlos. On Nov 12, 2015, at 2:01 PM, Stewart Bryant > wrote: As a requirements draft, I know of no IPR per se, but the reader may be drawn to the solutions posited in the SFL drafts which do have disclosed IPR. The reference in the text to the need to implement a solution to draft-tempia-ippm-p3m-02 by definition brings in it to play the IPR disclosed against that draft. - Stewart On 12/11/2015 16:28, Ross Callon wrote: Working Group, The authors of draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident have told us that the draft is ready to be polled to see if we have consensus to make it a workin= g group document. Before we start the adoption poll we will do an IPR poll. This mail starts = the IPR poll. Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). Currently there are no IPR disclosures that relate to this document. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor. If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. Thanks, Ross (as MPLS WG co-chair) --_000_D26BBC9B127D06swallowciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Same here.

George

From: Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@cisco.com>
Date: Thursday, November 12, 2015 a= t 6:34 PM
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Cc: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" <stbryant@cisco.com>, Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com= >, "lizhenbin@huawei.co= m" <lizhenbin@huawei.co= m>, Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org&quo= t; <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>=
Subject: Re: IPR poll on draft-brya= nt-mpls-flow-ident

Ditto.

Thanks,

— Carlos.

On Nov 12, 2015, at 2:01 PM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>= ; wrote:

As a requirements draft, I know of no IPR per se,
but the reader may be drawn to the solutions
posited in the SFL drafts which do have disclosed IPR.

The reference in the text to the need to implement a 
solution to
draft-tempia-ippm-p3m-02=20

by definition brings in it to play the IPR disclosed=20
against that draft.

- Stewart


On 12/11/2015 16:28, Ross Callon wrote:
Working Group,
 
The authors of draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident have told us that the
draft is ready to be polled to see if we have consensus to make it a wor= king
group document.
 
Before we start the adoption poll we will do an IPR poll. This mail star= ts the IPR poll.
 
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-bryant-mpls-flow-ident?
 
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
 
Currently there are no IPR disclosures that relate to this document.
 
If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to<= o:p class=3D"">
this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and contributor.<= /div>
 
If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or<= o:p class=3D"">
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any=
IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
 
Thanks, Ross
(as MPLS WG co-chair)
 



 --_000_D26BBC9B127D06swallowciscocom_--