IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Poll: IOAM and PSD

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Tue, 30 July 2024 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F2DC14F60B for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 08:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.757
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.757 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4briTUCwW6kL for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 08:26:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com (mail-pf1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C27B7C14F614 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 08:26:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-70eb73a9f14so3477820b3a.2 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 08:26:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1722353167; x=1722957967; darn=ietf.org; h=to:date:message-id:subject:mime-version:from:sender:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2h8NzoRR4VzTo5wqajl8XPe3COpwGmhxf7Om53U8ssw=; b=fABoo9tQDL84NE8Cs5OsgnTQ0+R98d6TMUP8YDIQnkPonvfml6qz69aexRqHP0NA2x VWaNP1VRP5sqh8MitAZVYroECJNp92JRN23llC051Lom8HC+z1Y02O9iXjuUWbf+61XU 5jSvo7i/0atTLJ8c3RAOInbPsjJxaP+VYBwL305VmZ3diJAnt31mBP6bdciMHvADDsnA 3YPjmlx3Zt+TuopKi3kP+xmqO5L+DCZrwdsDUEoFgUeXpvRqzdeMO95TJBT7WNVSVroX 4ye62qy6GkZqUbhh7vZ2ND3uycRLwBYh3dswp47XA+Bg6Jlo837uWSOEvVcpkIwrqg8/ M4fw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1722353167; x=1722957967; h=to:date:message-id:subject:mime-version:from:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2h8NzoRR4VzTo5wqajl8XPe3COpwGmhxf7Om53U8ssw=; b=J0nmdjlhqAi3dmSRvzIORwZn2USjqgdYjq9suXYyQ7HH86KLTEF+GE0HAfy+ItN7iu uuS9Buu2A8e97pkrVAInMrKA31DF344rjSXzwHibkNkAPThjOyzlQDilEZzNtmBtYaRb /RcrLALnZ2hD7QGmilHUBGG2dPDxLEV52hUQo9Zg3Yi8UPXzlI3xfhp+CpajMX58BjiM /c8AoDaN5sE3sI8Xl12gbtiQ+C99j+oOpA852jlDvjj8ZQHelfOunk9vyiY2omzc1t1B +iSic0gSFb0H3SoNH1EEWkEdPv4oivMMMdm5wKrWDsclWDkoK83iKHHeytoR3P61p3wH P84Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwbNUWptRpWDZhwK5RLsYk9dv2zNbGE0xehWJC4WQvTRoExoxO7 FrzKZnpbHDo9s0AplwPEm0wDBwh3GGuU8GjDNrLKQ9NS9ZpqeFN4K7zSSjGZ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEiUoTuWe2MvHukDpRdTR23AEvqcBRvolo2XaqSkwFt/+LvTVRyIpUQBn7jrW4+AKZjyy9vZA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:398b:b0:1c4:a531:bafd with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-1c4a531bbb1mr15141644637.18.1722353166724; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 08:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-73-93-167-4.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.93.167.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-70ead715733sm8542244b3a.84.2024.07.30.08.26.05 for <mpls@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Jul 2024 08:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3D0A9190-B39C-487D-972A-837E61AE7FAE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.600.62\))
Message-Id: <F78CB19B-2880-48AB-99CE-D46280014A87@tony.li>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 08:25:55 -0700
To: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.600.62)
Message-ID-Hash: WURNAPBESRV63GHR66E7GWVE3CVFQQDQ
X-Message-ID-Hash: WURNAPBESRV63GHR66E7GWVE3CVFQQDQ
X-MailFrom: tony1athome@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Poll: IOAM and PSD
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/lYOCj6TDz75EMYHIl1fKKl9QagE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

[WG chair hat: on]

 
Hi all,
 
We’ve had many discussions about IOAM and PSD over the last few years. We need to reach consensus on the problems that need to be addressed in these areas. Therefore, we would like to hear from everyone, especially independent operators:
 
There are many flavors of IOAM.  Which ones would you like to deploy/implement with MNA?
Do you have other applications of MNA that have not been proposed yet?
 
 This poll will close in two weeks, at 9am PDT, Aug 13.
 
Regards,
MPLS chairs

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status