Re: [mpls] Working Group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Tue, 31 May 2016 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C50812D520; Tue, 31 May 2016 09:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rs4hHKHPHDki; Tue, 31 May 2016 09:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FB9212D16E; Tue, 31 May 2016 09:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.102] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97345180155A; Tue, 31 May 2016 18:50:32 +0200 (CEST)
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <4bf47f82-154c-4e64-de7d-402edc21a95e@pi.nu>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <9d2d1f90-0974-dfcb-ac1c-d5d063c2bf0f@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 18:50:27 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4bf47f82-154c-4e64-de7d-402edc21a95e@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/lq_20YdnmiyzGCoZiEilPPjGeZU>
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time@ietf.org>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Working Group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 16:50:35 -0000

Working Group,

I seem not to be able to get this working group last call started
correctly :(

- first, I sent the mail without a copy to wg group
- second, I say in the text that "the authors and contributors (with
   one exception) have stated on the working group mailing list that
   they are not aware of any other IPRs [than what have been
   disclosed] that relates to this draft."
   This is not correct, ALL authors and contributors has responded to
   the IPR poll.

Sorry for fumbling in this way!!

/Loa

On 2016-05-31 18:27, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> This is to initiate a two week working group last call on
> draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-09.
>
> Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list (mpls@ietf.org).
>
> There were one IPR disclosure against the individual draft that this
> document replaced.
>
> The document shepherd and working group chairs are frequently asked
> about the working group discussions related to any IPR disclosures.
>
> We like to remind the working group that discussion on the content
> and validity of an IPR disclosure should not take place on the MPLS wg
> list or any IETF mailing lists.
>
> However we are looking for simple statements whether you think the
> working group should continue progress the document, regardless of an
> existing IPR disclosure. Please include this information in your
> "support/do not support" when responding to working group adoption
> calls and last calls.
>
> All the authors and contributors (with one exception) have stated on
> the working group mailing list that they are not aware of any other
> IPRs that relates to this draft.
>
> This working group last call ends June 15, 2016.
>
> CCAMP and TICTOC wg's,
>
> This is to inform you that this wglc is taking place, please direct the
> discussion to the mpls wg mailing list.
>
>
> /Loa
> for the MPLS wg chairs