[mpls] Implementation Poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-udp-return-path was:(Re: preparing the shepherd wwrite-up for draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-udp-return-path)
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sat, 17 October 2015 10:34 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3251ACDC8; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 03:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MDOO2GO_okpi; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 03:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 772541ACDC7; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 03:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.10] (unknown [112.205.73.125]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CA9518013B2; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:33:57 +0200 (CEST)
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <561281C8.3020404@pi.nu>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <56222407.3090902@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 18:33:43 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <561281C8.3020404@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/mBCO8xpJvvjcW-u0ewKn0sjDC2Q>
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-udp-return-path@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-udp-return-path.all@tools.ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Implementation Poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-udp-return-path was:(Re: preparing the shepherd wwrite-up for draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-udp-return-path)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 10:34:02 -0000
Folks, I've seen no responses on this, we had an early allocation motivated by implementations, so it might have been because of a cryptic subject. Resending with a clearer subject. /Loa On 2015-10-05 21:57, Loa Andersson wrote: > Working Group, > > We are preparing the Shepherd Write-Up for draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374- > udp-return-path. One question we need to answer is if we have know > implementations and/or deployments of the specification. > > This mail starts an implementation poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374- > udp-return-path. If you have an implementation or plan to implement > the draft please respond to this mail. > > /Loa > mpls wg co-chair
- [mpls] preparing the shepherd wwrite-up for draft… Loa Andersson
- [mpls] Implementation Poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Implementation Poll on draft-ietf-mpls… Sagar Soni (sagsoni)