IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

"Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE)" <michael.scharf@nokia.com> Thu, 03 November 2016 13:45 UTC

Return-Path: <michael.scharf@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7221299E1; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 06:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KqN30VaULo2H; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 06:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21573129522; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 06:45:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr712umx3.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.210.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 6846FB83E63C8; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 13:45:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.122]) by fr712umx3.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO-o) with ESMTP id uA3DjC8r003520 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 3 Nov 2016 13:45:13 GMT
Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712wxchhub03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.74]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id uA3Dj8wu005751 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 3 Nov 2016 14:45:12 +0100
Received: from FR712WXCHMBA15.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.7.251]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 14:44:54 +0100
From: "Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE)" <michael.scharf@nokia.com>
To: Igor Bryskin <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org)" <teas@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00
Thread-Index: AQHSNdciiwbM2GAvW0axSr1lXYwl+KDHRCFw
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 13:44:54 +0000
Message-ID: <655C07320163294895BBADA28372AF5D48B5BB53@FR712WXCHMBA15.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <AM2PR07MB09943987D6E27931F8C7CF3EF0A30@AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <0C72C38E7EBC34499E8A9E7DD007863908F0EF32@dfweml501-mbx>
In-Reply-To: <0C72C38E7EBC34499E8A9E7DD007863908F0EF32@dfweml501-mbx>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.40]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_655C07320163294895BBADA28372AF5D48B5BB53FR712WXCHMBA15z_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/mJzzynvnBqvw4Iz-sxP083NYlbo>
Subject: Re: [mpls] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 13:45:18 -0000

We have discussed this before. From an implementer's perspective, the two clean solutions to the problem seem to either stateful "compute-only" tunnels or a stateless RPC.

Michael


From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Igor Bryskin
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 2:34 PM
To: Daniele Ceccarelli; CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org); pce@ietf.org; TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org); mpls@ietf.org
Subject: [ALU] [mpls]http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

Hi,

>From the draft:

6.    YANG Model for requesting Path Computation


   Work on extending the TE Tunnel YANG model to support the need to
   request path computation has recently started also in the context of
   the [TE-TUNNEL<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00#ref-TE-TUNNEL>] draft.

   It is possible to request path computation by configuring a
   "compute-only" TE tunnel and retrieving the computed path(s) in the
   LSP(s) Record-Route Object (RRO) list as described in [TE-TUNNEL<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00#ref-TE-TUNNEL>].

   This is a stateful solution since the state of each created
   "compute-only" TE tunnel needs to be maintained and updated, when
   underlying network conditions change.

   The need also for a stateless solution, based on an RPC, has been
   recognized.


   The YANG model to support stateless RPC is for further study.





IB>> Please, note, that in the TE Tunnel model we consider the COMPUTE_AND_FORGET mode. We also consider the concept of path computation action to be defined under the TE tunnel node. All this is to facilitate stateless path computations.

Cheers,
Igor

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email