[mpls] Questions regarding RFC-6373

Naveen T <naveen.thanikachalam@yahoo.in> Fri, 03 March 2017 05:39 UTC

Return-Path: <naveen.thanikachalam@yahoo.in>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7CD12947C for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 21:39:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.in
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kha7ZDCwifyR for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 21:39:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nm39-vm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm39-vm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.229.166]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27AEF12944F for <mpls@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 21:39:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.in; s=s2048; t=1488519581; bh=MNi3Lcn9j/9lJKeGXLWQ7jh0AT71PypbaaGgjjGmdws=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=oLxa1UT24TPm8ZbNLoXij0g9idiGjb8293Zs/zBWxOljO1XSmuYq+3noQsEPzOz4BZeeOi2FCnFFJESrwhst9DkwOzWmSH6REyU8L00ouvepv5gRxF+3cI64qHyn1u4iO6AsPQrr0NNIKD6NRNM9xhU2OLFfwZNg5Uo9U/HG8mnOiheDq3OQaZb7uUfdU2UER6GyArAZo4HhBXbapHMSikLw0pF1tpi3WFLieniP7WMKUnVtEwFadh4XQ9QzLs2m5bIQcSCBqU/I8m8Vfwkz3wSpngb8Zylux9pCKqr3HKlmviT9/8GwXImJdigtp79MyE54TWqZqX4FGfnOikosAg==
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by nm39.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Mar 2017 05:39:41 -0000
Received: from [98.138.101.131] by nm39.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Mar 2017 05:36:52 -0000
Received: from [106.10.166.119] by tm19.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Mar 2017 05:34:52 -0000
Received: from [106.10.151.253] by tm8.bullet.mail.sg3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Mar 2017 05:34:51 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1002.mail.sg3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Mar 2017 05:34:51 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 849147.91265.bm@omp1002.mail.sg3.yahoo.com
X-YMail-OSG: 6G77Re0VM1nzLfamlCIEQemC0XTMIeZOUqE.JmO0x6gPMF93.KipCcPy2v7BPUf nmYKYcT.DX_GpM.NQTC7TAFgt3kqKmVSdf9xY2rSgOYRJRNvC24yAZybydPD.4lUntYvIGIZhXEQ TTCg99mdNhDvvIqEK0kJCljNl4a4mKuYNqcCqs.QSUq4WiIZknaXYoe2PG2wGuENuaCp.fMwz8yP vMBZ01xs4Pe.UOm5pctVobsMeDaEC1TgmUGHJKe6B3t.0.6jwpKZQOUDlff0359MONz36xXMKYo8 736he7CkslwPHOqrN5QMfHnqYa1cyHE_SE1vUNiPLs4eaMA6f6JTUFv_PxRjOFkPOJybYsgZ4whT 3lmHPxjZjZ8vvhsoac4gycXsWeVIk460Gn9Zy.ujWrENwf_yPOnftnOFVyRFFb1VBXbTebTF5ePW Rq51WMCAHeHkTd2OmDNAItWHFyd1HsBDQHpO4EGSw8cjkgPECuBAQZTjMksqBRxjdR_XPx1ESw_2 bjwFoPxkKb6sAgg5jx6zqVX_LdjJ0ymEJBT7vHeGpOuLcB4CRWYcxTiJmTlRG4FW34tvtkXsW9B8 UsTR0dAunc1nkQBX8VDw-
Received: from jws600024.mail.sg3.yahoo.com by sendmailws106.mail.sg3.yahoo.com; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 05:34:51 +0000; 1488519291.495
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 05:34:51 +0000 (UTC)
From: Naveen T <naveen.thanikachalam@yahoo.in>
To: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, Mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1693389752.245372.1488519291327@mail.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_245371_2064541237.1488519291326"
References: <1693389752.245372.1488519291327.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/nZ4Glq-T-GNeOhn7GkaFkLJ9aw8>
Subject: [mpls] Questions regarding RFC-6373
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Naveen T <naveen.thanikachalam@yahoo.in>
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 05:39:44 -0000

Dear Authors, et al.,
The RFC 6737 defines a control plane framework for MPLS-TP networks and suggests the usage ofGMPLS to signal the MPLS-TP transport path.
Further to this, we found an expired draft, https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-chen-ccamp-mpls-tp-oio-00.txt, that talksabout carrying the MPLS-TP indentifiers in the RSVP-TE path message.However, since this draft has expired, is there any other way to transport the MPLS-TP identifiers during the pathestablishment? Thanks and Regards,Naveen T