Re: [mpls] Poll 1: ISD and PSD in the MNA Framework

[[e-mail]]

+1

Xiao Min
------------------原始邮件------------------
发件人：GregMirsky
收件人：Loa Andersson;
抄送人：[e-mail];[e-mail];DetNet Chairs;[e-mail];
日 期 ：2022年05月31日 22:33
主 题 ：Re: [mpls] Poll 1: ISD and PSD in the MNA Framework
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

Dear Loa, MPLS WG Chairs, Open DT, et al.,please find my answers to posted questions in-lined below tagged GIM>>.

Regards,
Greg

On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 2:20 PM Loa Andersson <[e-mail]> wrote:
MPLS working group and and the Open MPLS DT,
The working group chairs believe the current situation is:
The Framework document must be solution independent and say:
GIM>> Agree

a packet may carry Ancillary Data using one or both of the following
methods:
(1) in-stack, and
(2) post-stack.
GIM>> Agree

It is up to the document specifying the Network Action to specify which
method is to be used for which Ancillary Data.
Note, a Network Action may not require inclusion of Ancillary Data.
GIM>> I agree with the position stated above.

Is this the consensus of the working group? Please respond to the MPLS
WG mail list.
Loa Andersson
for the Open DT wg chairs
--
Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: [phone]
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls