IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] A question about the benefit of not using ISD MNA

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Sat, 24 February 2024 01:11 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF5EC14F5F7; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:11:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.208
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NvljdNV0784A; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:11:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb31.google.com (mail-yb1-xb31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3BC9C14F6E8; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:11:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb31.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-dcdb210cb6aso1642043276.2; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:11:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1708737091; x=1709341891; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HUEdLKNXsJK41LQAx9GtvTiD+j3jv4kpl77a23IJYzA=; b=IGXiaqbzULFR7TQXKRNJ8qKTgzVys6nHbfOFRyecQlJDvreKbSrBFjQoL2LNB8eQDf byg69645z35Xq6rVtKHB27ZDkR6rObBkbjo9KAzqJI41sO1IXsgBtBgSeU5o8nWfIuCj x/uC21nnuW3sQG6TBbl9F1buIufdZQd6OVR3EgCDBzp+sbeWo3XQk2NE2Lc/mgBMcwtW gzJhbTpL5pryJorOTb3as5MGyEbnDm1s7zgrBFOtxyxJz6PMw5bJvVv+vucdaFY2mEYY /3gEWnGHXkg3lX6j2fFiSRRTox6eqrm9IfqIFkbZEnSTTj1La9B72Xj3Fh1cLlU36Vj/ GtPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708737091; x=1709341891; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HUEdLKNXsJK41LQAx9GtvTiD+j3jv4kpl77a23IJYzA=; b=RO5CKzfkfMWs0bh/TQf15bBNWT6rbsnm1Z6wzcxOVnfVIfxX4KlZVmfP/aSg1ZZXty lVOGvy8aGoyomVZGLlmjJZjSqG10h7aLKx37RVRRzcoocJGA+PeX/4/lOb3lYqzzo/ep WpIu3divfmvBW9xcyF80cRUIo+fx4MVz7HdKHsUc6QnKx4NevI7XzYLxQR0+UTH6mFMU GbEvQysVMeoreHv9QZg6cuE+PwMoZy9gPh7Heo1Y2L7ZG47xE2DUV5hB3aEfGT5++ghv coemiWWGVl85U1vbSGm5o4XgNXUthrr27bzXjE+Opvl11ZDJ/jLsUMKww3VQ7Tz3NIMj M1VQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWNbhhswh23zKlagMwNgGA5JQOp5by9RgZWpMG2esuUJRsFJUixvLOY/2rZqFSfa7lVvStmFcPj8crUYTeUdK9zcvpqI826NH2kKiu7BQBjkpqcZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxReKJh5P7M4vxh+7ceOyFxWoJcMsC+l8xmnfIwk+VRkdKzPlvw EsUriU1QtbmOtNmzSnMan+PyF5ClZBuP7oAEYFgjJF5+0iTDRlpF53cqKHCMBIa0l+PCePpaaV9 PWSX9lYRiCo179PjgHzL0VbXrZwyvz4wJ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGFCxpW2Sm22srJ0PtTLrWaGIE/4Q6KGHAgXr0x3gYTirRF2J7QIRZ6IdhwXu5+47X9t6gYKu+hJXwGJabT5tM=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:820e:0:b0:dcc:273e:1613 with SMTP id q14-20020a25820e000000b00dcc273e1613mr1434605ybk.40.1708737091411; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:11:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:11:21 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmXRkY1Qc+a6LfgpwEunkvJp8FJMp5LdS8WtsP9wdFKfxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation@ietf.org, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, MPLS Working Group <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000059257c0612165ba9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/nhXtQb4t1GTeK1OEMWI27woa4kY>
Subject: [mpls] A question about the benefit of not using ISD MNA
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 01:11:38 -0000

Dear Authors,
I've read the draft and I have a question:

What benefits do you see to use the proposed in your draft solution instead
of using MPLS Network Action In-Stack Data approach?

I thought about it and, frankly, I don't have an answer. Thank you for your
consideration.

Regards,
Greg

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status