Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label

[Sri <[e-mail]>]

Accepted.

Thanks
Sri

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Sri,
>
> Thanks - see one inline.
>
> From: Sri Kini <[e-mail]>
> Date: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 at 1:09 PM
> To: Acee Lindem <[e-mail]>
> Cc: Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "
> [e-mail]" <
> [e-mail]>, "
> [e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on
> draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label
>
> Thanks Acee for the comments. I accept the comments but pls see inline at
> Sri> for some clarification.
>
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
>> I support publication of this work. I have the following editorial
>> comments:
>>
>> 208,209c208,209
>> <    source routed label stacks.  Lets L_N-P denote the label to be used
>> <    to reach the node SID of LSR P.  Let L_A-Ln denote the label used for
>> ---
>> >    source routed label stacks.  Let L_N-P3 denote the label to be used
>> >    to reach the node SID of LSR P3.  Let L_A-Ln denote the label used
>> for
>>
>
> Sri> Changing 'Lets' to 'Let' is fine. Note that we are introducing
> notation here that can be applied to specific node and adjacency SIDs. So
> L_N-P is the generic notation for the label used for the SID of the node P,
> which when applied to the SID for the node P3 becomes the label L_N-P3.  So
> I prefer that the rest of the sentence stay as-is.
>
>
> It is still wrong since the original sentence specifically references LSR
> P3.  Perhaps:
>
>     source routed label stacks.  Let L_N-Px denote the label to be used
>     to reach the node SID of LSR Px.  Let L_A-Ln denote the label used for
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
>
>
>> 322c322
>> <    label stack.  In the example described in Section 3 it will result in
>> ---
>> >    label stack.  In the example described in Section 3, it will result
>> in
>>
>
> Sri> Accepted
>
>
>> 330c330
>> <    Section 3 the LSR P1 would poorly load-balance traffic on the
>> ---
>> >    Section 3, the LSR P1 would poorly load-balance traffic on the
>>
>
> Sri> Accepted
>
>
>> 349c349
>> <    This option was discounted since there exist a number of hardware
>> ---
>> >    This option was rejected since there are a number of hardware
>>
>
> Sri> Accepted
>
>
>> 351,352c351,352
>> <    Choosing this option can lead to a loss of load-balancing using EL in
>> <    a significant part of the network but that is a critical requirement
>> ---
>> >    Choosing this option can lead to EL load-balancing interruptions in
>> >    a significant part of the network and that is a critical requirement
>>
>
> Sri> Accepted
>
>
>> 377c377
>> <    This option was discounted due to the existence of hardware
>> ---
>> >    This option was rejected due to the existence of hardware
>>
>
> Sri> Accepted
>
>
>> 381c381
>> <    restrict the number of tunnels that can form a LSP and constrain the
>> ---
>> >    restrict the number of LSRs that can form an LSP and constrain the
>>
>
> Accepted
>
>
>> 419c419
>> <    This option was discounted due to the significant change in label
>> ---
>> >    This option was rejected due to the significant change in label
>>
>
> Sri> Accepted
>
>
>> 432c432
>> <    This option was discounted due to the significant change in label
>> ---
>> >    This option was rejected due to the significant change in label
>>
>
> Sri> Accepted
>
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>>
>> On 4/23/16, 3:53 AM, "mpls on behalf of Loa Andersson"
>> <[e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> >Working Group,
>> >
>> >This is to initiate a two week working group last call on
>> >draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label.
>> >
>> >Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list ([e-mail]).
>> >
>> >There are no IPR disclosures against this document.
>> >
>> >All the authors and contributors (with one exception) have stated on
>> >the working group mailing list that they are not aware of any other
>> >IPRs that relates to this draft.
>> >
>> >This working group last call ends May 12, 2016.
>> >
>> >
>> >/Loa
>> >for the MPLS wg chairs
>> >--
>> >
>> >
>> >Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
>> >Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
>> >Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >mpls mailing list
>> >[e-mail]
>> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>
>
>