Re: [mpls] IPR poll for draft-ninan-mpls-spring-inter-domain-oam

[Samson <[e-mail]>]

Hi,
 I am not aware of any IPR other than the one disclosed by Juniper.
Thanks
Samson

On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 4:22 AM Loa Andersson <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Shraddha,
>
> I'm always a bit careful giving advice on IPRs and disclosures,
> decisions are entirely up to the disclosing party.
>
> However, the IETF processes expect that disclosures are correct, so I
> believe that a re-disclosure against the document we will do the working
> group adoption poll for is appropriate.
>
> /Loa
>
> On 02/11/2021 05:04, Shraddha Hegde wrote:
> > Loa,
> >
> > Juniper's IPR listed against previous document
> draft-ninan-spring-mpls-inter-as-oam applies to this
> > document as well. This is something  that can be handled in the backend
> or I
> > need to ask juniper legal to resubmit it?
> >
> > I am not aware of any IPR other than the one disclosed by Juniper.
> >
> > Rgds
> > Shraddha
> >
> >
> > Juniper Business Use Only
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>
> > Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2021 4:45 PM
> > To: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> Zafar Ali (zali) <[e-mail]>; Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) <
> [e-mail]>
> > Cc: [e-mail]
> > Subject: IPR poll for draft-ninan-mpls-spring-inter-domain-oam
> >
> > [External Email. Be cautious of content]
> >
> >
> > Working Group,
> >
> > We are preparing draft-ninan-mpls-spring-inter-domain-oam for the
> working group adoption poll.
> >
> > To do this we need to run an IPR poll.
> >
> > This mail initiates the IPR poll.
> >
> > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
> draft-ninan-mpls-spring-inter-domain-oam?
> >
> > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> >
> > There are no IPR disclosures directly against against this document.
> >
> > However, there were a disclosure against an earlier version of the
> document, draft-ninan-spring-mpls-inter-as-oam. It would be good if the
> authors could help us verify id this disclosure is still valid.
> >
> > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
> **The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list.** The document
> will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from
> each author and contributor.
> >
> > If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> >
> > /Loa
> >     mpls wg co-chair
> >
> > PS
> >
> > We expect responses from:
> >
> > S. Hegde
> > K. Arora
> > M. Srivastava
> > S. Ninan
> > N. Kumar
> > as co-authors; and
> >
> > Carlos Pignataro
> > Zafar Ali
> > as contributors
> >
> > --
> >
> > Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
> > Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
> > Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: [phone]
> >
>
> --
>
> Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
> Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: [phone]
>