Re: [mpls] addressing wgap comments on draft-zheng-mpls-lsp-ping-yang-cfg
<gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com> Mon, 10 June 2019 07:02 UTC
Return-Path: <gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E11F12008C; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 00:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id isX29rnrxbEM; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 00:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31A52120052; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 00:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.239]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 582E4CBF35E3532E9CB1; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:02:55 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mgapp02.zte.com.cn ([10.36.9.143]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id x5A72Qsd006290; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:02:26 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com)
Received: from mapi (mgapp02[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid81; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:02:25 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:02:25 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afa5cfe00810919bef6
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <201906101502257988400@zte.com.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com
To: loa@pi.nu, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn x5A72Qsd006290
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/oC5g_TcbagMfewhbJPDPxOPpzQo>
Subject: Re: [mpls] addressing wgap comments on draft-zheng-mpls-lsp-ping-yang-cfg
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 07:03:00 -0000
Dear Loa, WG Chairs, reviewers, et al, will go through all the comments we've received during the WG AP and respond to each and every comment as recommended by Loa. Regards, Greg ----------------- Authors, reviewers and working group, We did run a working group adoption poll on draft-zheng-mpls-lsp-ping- yang-cfg in Feb/Mar, we received good comments. After the authors had looked at the comments they came back and asked (paraphrase) "How much of this do we need to address before we can go ahead and adopt the document"? The working group chairs have discussed this and consulted the reviewers and some other experts. Our conclusion is that we should address all comments before re-starting the wgap. Please not that by "address" we mean that a response needs to be available for each comments, but we do not prescribe what that answer need to be, it could be for example: - good catch, we'll update! - we don't think the comment is correct, because of ... - we believe that this comment is best addressed after the document has become a working group document - or any variant on these themes Loa, Nic, Tarek mpls wg co-chairs
- [mpls] addressing wgap comments on draft-zheng-mp… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] addressing wgap comments on draft-zhen… gregory.mirsky