IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Seeking WG and chairs feedback on LDP/mLDP Yang doc split [Re: A quick update on LDP/mLDP Yang model (draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang)]

"Kamran Raza (skraza)" <skraza@cisco.com> Tue, 11 October 2016 19:07 UTC

Return-Path: <skraza@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEFAA129687; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 12:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mFSAvi2tMB9a; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 12:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8F42129684; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 12:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6323; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1476212845; x=1477422445; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=0o8EBW6q1OgY3pKA60XX5vEPGQLuQTRx/1/2vTgADUU=; b=Ik+htpliwv8zhdFRyMwptuYqBgdzqocFuoQFc6s7VxgL6Wr2hDgUv5TH aniCbYvrGOOCngUwpMs06i54T7me6hIjwfb+jI/mAooPDHeEmMmS+NdRK 56pzN9wIjb3sly3EjH5WWB5BUi3tbBK2bYI+g+y3lTQ7euP6fwvSQVqjH o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CrAQBBN/1X/5BdJa1cGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgwc1AQEBAQEdgVMHAY0rpiOFFIILhiCCCTgUAQIBAQEBAQEBXieEYQECBClQEgECFwMBAiQEORQJCgQBDQWIUMMvAQEBAQEBAQECAQEBAQEBAQEgjysRATyFIh0FjniFMIVaAY98gW6EZ4kghxCFaYN+AR42TYMmgTpyhkSBIAF/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,330,1473120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="158648643"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Oct 2016 19:07:24 +0000
Received: from xch-rcd-011.cisco.com (xch-rcd-011.cisco.com [173.37.102.21]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u9BJ7OQG000385 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:07:24 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) by XCH-RCD-011.cisco.com (173.37.102.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 14:07:24 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-013.cisco.com ([173.36.7.23]) by XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com ([173.36.7.23]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 14:07:23 -0500
From: "Kamran Raza (skraza)" <skraza@cisco.com>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Seeking WG and chairs feedback on LDP/mLDP Yang doc split [Re: [mpls] A quick update on LDP/mLDP Yang model (draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang)]
Thread-Index: AQHSI/KywiHy3+ADKkSsfe8TPCdXjA==
Importance: high
X-Priority: 1
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:07:23 +0000
Message-ID: <D422ADDC.1471D1%skraza@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.7.141117
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.194.138]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D422ADDC1471D1skrazaciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/oOo_1t7W7m9Ftp7sJ1fI9m3zrl8>
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Seeking WG and chairs feedback on LDP/mLDP Yang doc split [Re: A quick update on LDP/mLDP Yang model (draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang)]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:07:27 -0000

Hello MPLS WG and WG chairs,

[Refer to our email two weeks ago]

Keeping in view some of the MPLS-RT review comments and the current size of the join document (draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang), we, the authors, are thinking of splitting the LDP/mLDP Yang model into two separate documents - one for LDP and other for mLDP - and would like to get WG and chairs feedback on this.

Please comment/advise accordingly.
Rgds.
-
Kamran
(on behalf of authors)

From: Syed Kamran Raza <skraza@cisco.com<mailto:skraza@cisco.com>>
Date: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 1:14 PM
To: "mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>" <mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-chairs@ietf.org>" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-chairs@ietf.org>>
Cc: "Rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org<mailto:Rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>" <Rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org<mailto:Rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang@tools.ietf.org>>
Subject: [mpls] A quick update on LDP/mLDP Yang model (draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang)

Hello MPLS WG and WG chairs,

This email is to give a quick update on the current work being done on  the IETF LDP/mLDP Yang draft (draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang-00).

  *   Multi-vendor team is meeting twice a month to progress on the model:
     *   Cisco, Juniper, Huawei, Ciena, Ericsson, Nokia
  *   The current focus of the team is to:
     *   address remaining MPLS-RT comments
     *   divide the model into "base" and "extended" features
     *   general cleanup
  *   We plan to submit a next revision before next IETF.
  *   We also want to get feedback from WG/chairs on whether it makes sense to divide this large document (which is already > 115 pages) into two separate documents - one covering LDP Yang and other mLDP yang.
     *   We will still keep mLDP model dependent on LDP.
     *   Please advise.

Rgds.
-
Kamran
(on behalf of authors)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email