Re: [mpls] WGLC for draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr-02

Hi,

What about signaling of MTU, which in regular facility FRR is conveyed in ADSPEC within Path of backup LSP. Per my understanding with proposed solution this information is being lost. Maybe it could be done by signaling MTU in SUMMARY_FRR_BYPASS object and specifying procedure for MP regarding modifying ADSPEC objects of the protected LSPs.

Thank you.

> 26 янв. 2018 г., в 20:04, Mike Taillon (mtaillon) <mtaillon@cisco.com> написал(а):
> 
> I have reviewed the latest version of this document and believe this is ready to progress to the next stage.
> 
> Regards,
> -Mike (as a contributor)
> 
> 
>> On Jan 10, 2018, at 9:56 AM, N.Leymann@telekom.de <mailto:N.Leymann@telekom.de> wrote:
>> 
>> Working Group,
>>  
>> This is to initiate a two week MPLS working group last call in on 
>> draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr-02.
>>  
>> Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list (mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>).
>>  
>> Please note that there is already one IPR disclosed for the individual 
>> document:
>>  
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2580/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2580/>
>>  
>> All the authors and contributors have stated on the working group 
>> mailing list that they are not aware of any other IPRs that relates to 
>> this document. 
>>  
>> As with any WGLC, working group participants are requested to read 
>> the document and comment. If you feel that the document is ready 
>> for publication, it is appropriate to respond to the WGLC with a short 
>> and simple email indicating support. 
>>  
>> This working group last call ends January 24th, 2018.
>>  
>> Regards
>>  
>> Nic
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls