Re: [mpls] Progressing Resdience Time Measurement draft

Working Group and authors,

<chair hat off>
As a matter of fact I believe this document should be progressed.
<chair hat on>
This draft has been a working group document since early August, but
there has been no discussion on the document on the wg mailing list.

There are of course two ways if interpreting this.
- there is total agreement on the draft
- there is no intrest in the draft

I have no basis to decide which is the case.

Can we plese have at least a few (non-author) comments on the mailing
list if it is time to start the wglc.

/Loa
mpls wg co-chair

On 2015-12-15 07:21, Gregory Mirsky wrote:
> Dear Chairs of the MPLS WG,
>
> authors of the Residence Time Measurement in MPLS Network draft believe
> that all comments received during the WG adoption call been addressed.
> Thus, authors would like to ask the WG Chairs to consider WG LC as the
> next step.
>
>                  Regards,
>
>                                  Greg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>