IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Updated rev -08 posted [Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Fri, 28 February 2020 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DEDF3A18A3; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 06:16:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WzkzuQ_PkOIq; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 06:16:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from taper.sei.cmu.edu (taper.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50F283A18AA; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 06:16:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by taper.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 01SEG2k8027829; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 09:16:03 -0500
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 taper.sei.cmu.edu 01SEG2k8027829
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1582899363; bh=NxFYutJZqZ23xy3uwG97kcXTe0Vp7vU4VBmzTjglpwA=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FWW9gdAhyH8SUhqtmSipnsUvXH3CChk9KkImOTyeZCsGP7DUrTBSdfaM5L1/v1lZW S6YlX52MZB8AT69QvczsFhvk0Q3kYVuG2BgAXpKekMTQraAOzFyP2tpmaGX9K2w9Hv gg1hrzZ+7St4O2EwRjalLbPLQSBleytN7rv0mvrA=
Received: from CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cassina.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.249]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 01SEFxZI011785; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 09:15:59 -0500
Received: from MARCHAND.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.251]) by CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.249]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 09:15:59 -0500
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: "Kamran Raza (skraza)" <skraza@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Updated rev -08 posted [Re: [mpls] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]
Thread-Index: AQHV7e+KMhpzdI5At0eY8iQt426Qmagwpxow
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 14:15:58 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC0216F59CDC@marchand>
References: <9400B475-128E-484A-BB1E-8CAB6743A894@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <9400B475-128E-484A-BB1E-8CAB6743A894@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/p1DdMIfDw1r6JMScGXKlCHeYMLI>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Updated rev -08 posted [Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 14:16:12 -0000

Hi Kamran!

The changes in -08 address my concerns.  Thank you for making this update.

Regards,
Roman

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kamran Raza (skraza) <skraza@cisco.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2020 11:29 PM
> To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>rg>; The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: mpls@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang@ietf.org
> Subject: Updated rev -08 posted [Re: [mpls] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on
> draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]
> 
> Thanks for your review Roman.
> We have posted a new rev -08 that takes care your comments and
> comments from other IESG reviewers.
> On behalf of authors, Please see inline [skraza]:
> 
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>     DISCUSS:
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>     Thank you for using the YANG Security Considerations template.  Could you
>     please provide more details on which nodes are sensitive to write and read
>     issues; and the RPC operations of concern.  For example, see
>     draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg or draft-ietf-ospf-yang.
> 
> [skraza]: Done. Please see significantly enhanced section in the posted rev -
> 08.
> 
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>     COMMENT:
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>     A few trivial editorial nits:
> [skraza]: Have fixed all those.
> 
> 
>     * Section 1.1. Typo.  s/minumum/minimum/
>     * Section 1.1.  Typo. s/catogories/categories/
>     * Section 1.1.  Typo. s/higlighting/highlighting/
>     * Section 3.0.  Typo. s/grapically/graphically/
>     * Section 5.2.1.  Typo. s/an network-instance/a network-instance/
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     mpls mailing list
>     mpls@ietf.org
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email