Re: [mpls] Request for comments on draft-malis-mpls-sfc-encapsulation-00.txt

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Sun, 24 June 2018 16:29 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DB5PR0301MB1909733B4E15C94FED93B9D89D4B0@DB5PR0301MB1909.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAA=duU1jh5vw37U+st3oNgR7bLmod__Qub8A4x2LEXmP-rwppA@mail.gmail.com> <DB5PR0301MB1909733B4E15C94FED93B9D89D4B0@DB5PR0301MB1909.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 12:29:27 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU3URO7GTT7Ricwk7YjziabkSfyg3LDaWbXm-sxA1+3NOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000372a0056f65c62d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/p8WkvZ-Gxg_GHC57Enmv_tLtFBA>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Request for comments on draft-malis-mpls-sfc-encapsulation-00.txt
Precedence: list

Sasha,

Yes, thanks for asking, we can add that to the next revision. The intent is
that the NSH label operates similar to a PW or VPN label, so whatever
applies to them should apply to the NSH label as well.

And thanks for reading the draft!

Cheers,
Andy


On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Alexander Vainshtein <
Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com> wrote:

> Andy and all,
>
> I’ve read the draft and I have a question regarding position of the SFF
> label in the label stack.
>
> The draft states the SFF label is located at the bottom of the stack and
> immediately followed by the NSH header.
>
>
>
> I wonder if it is possible to have some special purpose labels to follow
> the SFF label. The relevant example could be GAL (RFC 5586) followed by the
> GACH for OAM purposes.
>
> RFC 7708 has allowed this for PW labels which originally also have been
> defined as BoS only
>
>
>
> Regards, and lots of thanks in advance,
>
> Sasha
>
>
>
> Office: +972-39266302
>
> Cell:      +972-549266302
>
> Email:   Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com
>
>
>
> *From:* mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Andrew G. Malis
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 19, 2018 6:14 PM
> *To:* mpls@ietf.org; sfc@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [mpls] Request for comments on draft-malis-mpls-sfc-
> encapsulation-00.txt
>
>
>
> I’ve just uploaded https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-malis-mpls-sfc-
> encapsulation-00 . It’s a short draft that discusses how to carry SFC
> packets that include the NSH over MPLS from one SFF to the next, so that
> SFFs that support the NSH can be connected via MPLS. It also includes the
> ability for MPLS nodes to support more than one SFF. Comments are
> appreciated!
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> _______________
>
> This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains
> information which is
> CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have
> received this
> transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then
> delete the original
> and all copies thereof.
> ____________________________________________________________
> _______________
>

Re: [mpls] Request for comments on draft-malis-mp… Stewart Bryant
Re: [mpls] Request for comments on draft-malis-mp… Eric C Rosen
Re: [mpls] [sfc] Request for comments on draft-ma… Stewart Bryant
[mpls] Request for comments on draft-malis-mpls-s… Andrew G. Malis
Re: [mpls] Request for comments on draft-malis-mp… Andrew G. Malis
Re: [mpls] Request for comments on draft-malis-mp… Alexander Vainshtein