[mpls] RFC 7026 on Retiring TLVs from the Associated Channel Header of the MPLS Generic Associated Channel
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Tue, 03 September 2013 22:41 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C60621E80AD; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 15:41:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LObFI9MJgHnp; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 15:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DD621E80AA; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 15:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 06F62B1E00D; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 15:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20130903223538.06F62B1E00D@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:35:38 -0700
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, mpls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [mpls] RFC 7026 on Retiring TLVs from the Associated Channel Header of the MPLS Generic Associated Channel
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 22:41:14 -0000
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 7026 Title: Retiring TLVs from the Associated Channel Header of the MPLS Generic Associated Channel Author: A. Farrel, S. Bryant Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: September 2013 Mailbox: adrian@olddog.co.uk, stbryant@cisco.com Pages: 5 Characters: 9297 Updates: RFC 5586 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-mpls-retire-ach-tlv-03.txt URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7026.txt The MPLS Generic Associated Channel (G-ACh) is a generalization of the applicability of the pseudowire (PW) Associated Channel Header (ACH). RFC 5586 defines the concept of TLV constructs that can be carried in messages on the G-ACh by placing them in the ACH between the fixed header fields and the G-ACh message. These TLVs are called ACH TLVs No Associated Channel Type yet defined uses an ACH TLV. Furthermore, it is believed that handling TLVs in hardware introduces significant problems to the fast path, and since G-ACh messages are intended to be processed substantially in hardware, the use of ACH TLVs is undesirable. This document updates RFC 5586 by retiring ACH TLVs and removing the associated registry. This document is a product of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/search/rfc_search.php For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC