Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document

정태식 <cts@etri.re.kr> Mon, 07 March 2016 08:47 UTC

Return-Path: <cts@etri.re.kr>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D591B37CA; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 00:47:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MlOmA05AVySm; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 00:47:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpeg.etri.re.kr (smtpeg2.etri.re.kr [129.254.27.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1E311B37C5; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 00:47:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SMTP2.etri.info (129.254.28.72) by SMTPEG2.etri.info (129.254.27.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 17:47:19 +0900
Received: from SMTP4.etri.info ([169.254.3.245]) by SMTP2.etri.info ([10.2.6.31]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 17:47:18 +0900
From: =?utf-8?B?7KCV7YOc7Iud?= <cts@etri.re.kr>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document
Thread-Index: AQHRdrqDPmi8hSPX4k6Li5qC74xz7p9Nrj9Q
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:47:18 +0000
Message-ID: <AD98114A73E97041A2EDDCC3F3D10B035524E676@SMTP4.etri.info>
References: <56DA9B26.8050800@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <56DA9B26.8050800@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US, ko-KR
Content-Language: ko-KR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [129.254.73.86]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/pNg6XLZhGrHL_i-s1b6RJRCzXxs>
Cc: "draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org" <draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 08:47:23 -0000

Yes, I support.

Best regards,
Taesik


-----Original Message-----
From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.nu] 
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2016 5:39 PM
To: mpls@ietf.org
Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org
Subject: Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document

Working Group,

This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps- updates as an MPLS working group document.

Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that the document should not be adopted as a working group document.

There are no IPR disclosures against this document.

All the authors has stated on the on the mpls wg mailing list that they are not aware of any IPRs that relate to this document.

Note: One of the issues that surfaced in the MPLS-RT review was that the implementation status was unclear. To check on this we did an early implementation poll. There have been responses to the mailing, to the mpls wg chairs and to my uni-directionally. The conclusion is that RFC 7271 (the specification that this document updates) is well implemented and we know of deployments; a rather large number of vendors says that they will implement this draft and operators has stated that it will be deployed once it is available.

The working group adoption poll ends March 19, 2016.

/Loa

MPLS wg co-chair.
-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64