Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 31 May 2016 03:29 UTC
Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088C512D607; Mon, 30 May 2016 20:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZjUFFGtgrudH; Mon, 30 May 2016 20:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com (mail-pa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FAE712D5F6; Mon, 30 May 2016 20:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id um11so14571285pab.0; Mon, 30 May 2016 20:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ksR06o8mRw5XxV4gy7LgFywISpC5V1cP/7is6by3bHU=; b=eMuAyTwoSKWIA/pk7thODW+WE6MchnkrXb8KVR14MIagL63DdHETL62h7dXTt57ttK TJqoy0/TOSbeHD61n6CUS3iJ+HOVIkcQvr1/VUoQdx4Bad9dMWjYXZRvVW+g64WQoXx7 OoRpSWVfjl+jv7zp1zhZMCNBbCNz/isI+fmLaJsw78rE8l94m5F0SLQSmm3vIH04qFq2 g9fbVXbqvmIa/uMe/txc7tAJaDtVNxLq1t9QxlqgVB/iehgB48/u+LS7yOaGKF/DERbv dKCG88sY5rxKw0lyUeNphX5i23+tLJrB8ZvHv/5IorbCFUK3U7bUGBmlLDwd1dnm6MTN zR7g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ksR06o8mRw5XxV4gy7LgFywISpC5V1cP/7is6by3bHU=; b=C5zs7K01xdf/MpewLUUtDYBZyeSxAuPARxszUZlL8yrtNuKiKnJeZNJIiJBvTqC2f0 L8nIhfIHIf3j8bvVeSB62rkVYLVV2ZNNvw8smrEv6KWsmjtkuh7Pw/DknAUZ+S98Full FnZCkpYq954a7E7NCbHKyResyvL4DZtFixjPsriFE01fBiB6UPDeMt79q4Df5qprORXT 3DeqjH+qAhDwCxzW4gPymLyWGS3go+512ta7c0sf0gLcYXO71dkTRGgis7+sYxPGTm5x rEasHO+ZAGZ70xHvdyAg0GfAgYsl/UIyCIRoWNNtyUcjborDkWuCqwSjQnCqlq29VIbv fe4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI7pg+WwuHjajsCZVTnmir7yTmpo5On6qXm2aCogiXgGnw0FSsHdT8MXqXnYGjlbw==
X-Received: by 10.66.255.102 with SMTP id ap6mr19947743pad.2.1464665365878; Mon, 30 May 2016 20:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.117] (66-189-255-235.dhcp.reno.nv.charter.com. [66.189.255.235]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s14sm50634425pag.7.2016.05.30.20.29.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 30 May 2016 20:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.16.0.160506
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 20:29:18 -0700
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <2D2BDAB7-3016-4BDF-BFED-CB53ACD37C5F@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/pZl0V1RTR3UUB5dk70OmT7NOdn8>
Cc: "draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org" <draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org>, "draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org" <draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 03:29:29 -0000
Yes/support >>Working Group, >> >>This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-saad-mpls-static- >>yang-03 and draft-saad-mpls-base-yang-00 as MPLS working group >>documents. >> >>Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working >>group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org) Please give a technical >>motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that >>the document should not be adopted as a working group document. >> >>There are no IPR disclosures against either document. An IPR poll has >>been started in parallel to this adoption poll >> >>The working group adoption poll ends June 2, 2016, given that the IPR >>poll has concluded. >> >>/Loa >> >>MPLS wg co-chair. >>-- >> >> >>Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com >>Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu >>Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 >> > >_______________________________________________ >mpls mailing list >mpls@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt … Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- [mpls] 答复: poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Chenxia (D)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Tarek Saad (tsaad)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Shah, Himanshu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Wen, Bin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Raqib Jones
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Santosh Esale
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Loa Andersson