Re: [mpls] [RTG-DIR] Routing directorate review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-hello-crypto-auth-08.txt

["Adrian Farrel" <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Joel!

I have added your nit to my IESG evaluation as a Comment so that we don't drop it.

Cheers,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtg-dir [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
> Sent: 04 June 2014 02:20
> To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-hello-crypto-
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] Routing directorate review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-hello-
> crypto-auth-08.txt
> 
> [Apologies, this review was due two weeks ago.  On the other hand, you
> have reved it 3 times during my laggard behavior.]
> 
> Hello mpls WG,
> 
> I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft.
> The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related
> drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and
> sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide
> assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing
> Directorate, please see 
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir
> 
> Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it
> would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF
> Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through
> discussion or by updating the draft.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-hello-crypto-auth-08.txt
> Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
> Review Date: 3-June-2014
> IETF LC End Date: closed
> Intended Status: Standards Track
> 
> This document is basically ready for publication, but has nits that
> should be considered prior to publication.
> 
> The one nit is that I could not find the text indicating that if a
> receiver receives an unauthenticated LDP Hello packet, and is expecting
> authentication to be used (either always, or with the source the packet
> claims to be from) then the hello packet should be silently discarded.
> 
> Yours,
> Joel