Re: [mpls] Progressing Resdience Time Measurement draft

Hi Loa,

I support progression of the draft, it is needed for time synchronization protocols when transported over MPLS network.
Thanks!  

Cheers,
Jeff

On 12/15/15, 04:23, "mpls on behalf of Loa Andersson" <mpls-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of loa@pi.nu> wrote:

>
>Working Group and authors,
>
><chair hat off>
>As a matter of fact I believe this document should be progressed.
><chair hat on>
>This draft has been a working group document since early August, but
>there has been no discussion on the document on the wg mailing list.
>
>There are of course two ways if interpreting this.
>- there is total agreement on the draft
>- there is no intrest in the draft
>
>I have no basis to decide which is the case.
>
>Can we plese have at least a few (non-author) comments on the mailing
>list if it is time to start the wglc.
>
>/Loa
>mpls wg co-chair
>
>On 2015-12-15 07:21, Gregory Mirsky wrote:
>> Dear Chairs of the MPLS WG,
>>
>> authors of the Residence Time Measurement in MPLS Network draft believe
>> that all comments received during the WG adoption call been addressed.
>> Thus, authors would like to ask the WG Chairs to consider WG LC as the
>> next step.
>>
>>                  Regards,
>>
>>                                  Greg
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>mpls mailing list
>mpls@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls