Re: [mpls] MPLS-RT review od draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis

["Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <[e-mail]>]

> On Dec 6, 2015, at 1:22 AM, [e-mail] wrote:
> 
> Hi, all
> This is an updated draft of RFC4379, and most of content is same as 4379. So yes, it should be adopted as WG document.

Thanks, Lizhong.

> Except the to do list which still needs further evaluation, only very minor comments as below:
> 1. Obsoletes: 4379, 6829 (if approved)
> Why 6829 is listed, but 7506 is not?
> 
> 2. Throughout the document, "echo request" and "Echo Request"(section 3.3), "echo reply" and "Echo Reply"(section 4.4) are used. Shall we have a uniformed type?

I agree with both and have captured them for after adoption.

Thanks,

— Carlos.

> 
> Regards
> Lizhong
> 
> From: Loa Andersson <mailto:[e-mail]>
> Date: 2015-11-20 10:19
> To: Lizhong Jin <mailto:[e-mail]>; yshen <mailto:[e-mail]>; Curtis Villamizar <mailto:[e-mail]>; David Allan I <mailto:[e-mail]>
> CC: [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
> Subject: MPLS-RT review od draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis
> Lizhong, Yimin, Curtis, and  Dave,
> 
> 
> You have been selected as MPLS-RT reviewers for draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis.
> 
> Note to authors: You have been CC'd on this email so that you can know
> that this review is going on. However, please do not review your own
> document.
> 
> Reviews should comment on whether the document is coherent, is it
> useful (ie, is it likely to be actually useful in operational networks),
> and is the document technically sound?
> 
> We are interested in knowing whether the document is ready to be
> considered for WG adoption (ie, it doesn't have to be perfect at this
> point, but should be a good start).
> 
> This MPLS-RT review is a bit different in that it is a bis-version of
> a widely implemented and deployed protocol, however the basic question
> is the same - are we ready to adopt it as a wg document? If the meet
> all the criteria LSP Ping will be progressed to Internet Standard.
> 
> Reviews should be sent to the document authors, WG co-chairs and WG
> secretary, and CC'd to the MPLS WG email list. If necessary, comments
> may be sent privately to only the WG chairs.
> 
> If you have technical comments you should try to be explicit about what
> needs to be resolved before adopting it as a working group document, and
> what can wait until the document is a working group document and the
> working group has the revision control.
> 
> Are you able to review this draft by December 6, 2015? Please respond
> in a timely fashion.
> 
> Thanks, Loa
> (as MPLS WG chair)
> 
> 
> --
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
> Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]