IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr

"Mike Taillon (mtaillon)" <mtaillon@cisco.com> Wed, 22 November 2017 13:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mtaillon@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6755912942F; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 05:14:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CK_axB9225z6; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 05:14:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9586C127010; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 05:14:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7513; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1511356463; x=1512566063; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=ZBnLJhgMYWYSnHuMRenCmcy4QGlEE+E3aflqLD6RGpE=; b=cIV1TQam6MceXd0Mlgdu+PLJTXstAhyNaRy/a3HOGuNT4KMt4IAEb8vN 4XCBsVscT0pivZePnTEaIF2VylJXS0uCEukMQ4umeJT7WpUDaO0/FBJwU UXALQ9794poXdMOwRAeWnNmOr8zTaLiNlrIXN+rx+aM6rQw5FHyDrFR1F I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DyAACndxVa/5xdJa1bGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJKcmZuJweOF48VkxmFSRCCAQoYAQqFGAKFGT8YAQEBAQEBAQEBax0LhR8CAQMBAWwGBRACAQg/BycLFBEBAQQOBYk+ZBCqI4p3AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWDOoIHgVWBaSmDAoRoARIBg2WCMgWZJIkcAodwjRqCFoYMiyuMdYkVAhEZAYE5AR85QkFyehVJLQGCNoRfd4hYgSSBFAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,436,1505779200"; d="scan'208,217";a="321935310"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Nov 2017 13:13:53 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-020.cisco.com (xch-aln-020.cisco.com [173.36.7.30]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vAMDDqmO009193 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 22 Nov 2017 13:13:53 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-019.cisco.com (173.36.7.29) by XCH-ALN-020.cisco.com (173.36.7.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 07:13:51 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-019.cisco.com ([173.36.7.29]) by XCH-ALN-019.cisco.com ([173.36.7.29]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 07:13:51 -0600
From: "Mike Taillon (mtaillon)" <mtaillon@cisco.com>
To: "n.leymann@telekom.de" <N.Leymann@telekom.de>
CC: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr
Thread-Index: AdNUg1Cpe5dA+Y+xRUqVbHS1g/VoIAPQq44A
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 13:13:51 +0000
Message-ID: <5741A200-F6B3-4A60-B4E6-57CFEF3FC8B1@cisco.com>
References: <3a590768494f45208f2c568b80913b91@HE105662.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
In-Reply-To: <3a590768494f45208f2c568b80913b91@HE105662.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.2.65]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5741A200F6B34A60B4E657CFEF3FC8B1ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/q08yanOAvNevmQLcU7x90XW8HeU>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 13:14:25 -0000

Hi

I am not aware of any additional IPR that applies to this draft.

-mike

On Nov 4, 2017, at 5:01 AM, n.leymann@telekom.de<mailto:n.leymann@telekom.de> <N.Leymann@telekom.de<mailto:N.Leymann@telekom.de>> wrote:

Working Group,

We are currently preparing draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr for working group last call. We will do an IPR poll prior to the wglc.

This is to start the IPR Poll.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

Please note that there is already one IPR disclosed for the individual document:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2580/

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Best regards

Nic





_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email