Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates

Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com> Mon, 07 November 2016 09:27 UTC

Return-Path: <huubatwork@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B19129B92; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 01:27:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kBdVIxQXLo9Z; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 01:27:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0535129DEB; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 01:27:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id u144so26569134wmu.1; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 01:27:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from:message-id :disposition-notification-to:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=is29vlE2QaWjiX8D+T0Bxl8x1b5ecjrWPl4kYuoKDQA=; b=ro2iot4mogUWv2QBreE3jNuFzN9qKBVqRD5K60U9sDL+oBpkTQ+aQuxO+bjM6IuK0z grDCYf53F/L4Om8KaVtMWC7DK7c8/FWIztEi9x7OcldoisnPmU1/hefHQIked2wA4s3X c6U4ic15UK8116pWUj2Qx1v75PZvb/yExHRhry0TILmG97tO1Zt3GF74mFDJCVtl04wn IylGQ447KG1vVW95R+90sc/0gRRc4G1+Lyuc7H+WZLRabUPdhIXTCXLhldV2vrCgYHP7 ZkMFXwrRbQ6Zs8Wi5XGAsefAhPkC1ENMEeeKCHHuLm0UV6CAS8yl2vgJ69NuRj1Dv/wu 6eqQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from :message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=is29vlE2QaWjiX8D+T0Bxl8x1b5ecjrWPl4kYuoKDQA=; b=iHHk5x3AFONaNjxvsFDleyC/u1CbO5eMXtH6G1EzGDtfM4CQLT4S8Lpk8Xn5WwWLI6 ynmNn+/ogltqH0J4KOGO7iJXczOZFXFOXWp693SfLToN5azl9FvDebvniriygO8WJym1 qTKvgR7Qx2/JlXJGGoKyj8gnRRGmX/o1kxbutebAEHvWvGb8k/pKCaFXc1X6ebpkzA2C FAqBqz79Uo2zHGMCiYDlAwM/yPwbRvlsIqLPno8+qI++5VoDf+gQwmYXuUjV1nWw3uLj aCDqeQXxZVLI3X/fJa8gQE2wTqymaGLTFbquAkGyBTTkXAZGeT4puaaTXdtaAKk8CHlL 0Tsg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdwaktYcg34/7y1jizUD+x9GJ9CCdOGDiiY0thKxjCnxVx7rC7r/e2sPU536o5Ysw==
X-Received: by 10.28.47.198 with SMTP id v189mr7740189wmv.75.1478510826306; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 01:27:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from McAsterix.local ([92.109.37.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jt8sm29852083wjc.33.2016.11.07.01.27.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Nov 2016 01:27:05 -0800 (PST)
References: <35e17fc3-fc6f-2ae6-5eda-bda8624250e6@pi.nu>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org>
From: Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <77c4389c-cc3b-1df3-f3cb-15799ababafa@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 10:27:05 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <35e17fc3-fc6f-2ae6-5eda-bda8624250e6@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/q0Hjd6JV0LcoSRV3QVtlai2-jZM>
Cc: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: huubatwork@gmail.com
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 09:27:11 -0000

Hej Loa, (and extended readership)

No, I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft

Best regards, Huub.

--------
> Working Group,
>
> We are currently preparing draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates-01 for working
> group last call. We will do an IPR poll prior to the wglc.
>
> This is to start the IPR Poll.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates?
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> There is no IPR disclosure filed directly against this documents.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list.* The
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
> /Loa
> mpls wg co-chair
>
> PS
> I've resent this mail, apologies to those of you that got it twice.
>


-- 
================================================================
Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...