IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1435/

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sat, 13 February 2016 05:16 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53901B2C38; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 21:16:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lq8nNJMJvCRD; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 21:16:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCDEF1B2C73; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 21:16:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.13] (unknown [49.149.199.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4015F180137F; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 06:16:45 +0100 (CET)
To: huubatwork@gmail.com, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, Scott Mansfield <scott.mansfield@ericsson.com>, mpls@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org
References: <56B32ED2.7020103@pi.nu> <EF35EE4B92789843B1DECBC0E24558644BE3D966@eusaamb105.ericsson.se> <56B417DB.10905@pi.nu> <EF35EE4B92789843B1DECBC0E24558644BE41AAE@eusaamb105.ericsson.se> <56B5E615.4090407@pi.nu> <EF35EE4B92789843B1DECBC0E24558644BE475A3@eusaamb105.ericsson.se> <152d5519298.2818.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net> <56BE2238.1050906@gmail.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <56BEBC35.5010108@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:16:37 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56BE2238.1050906@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000003030502050804040303"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/q8pgv4_9I59uzD1OqvZtgBhIxh0>
Subject: Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1435/
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 05:16:53 -0000

Folks,

This is the list of active IDs, if we want to use it, please feel free
to do so.

draft-ietf-mpls-rmr is strictly not a mpls-tp ID, but since there seems
to be interest it could be included as "WG Document".

/Loa

On 2016-02-13 02:19, Huub van Helvoort wrote:
> Hello Lou,
>
> You wrote:
>
>> - Is it worth providing a list of RFCs and wg IDs, perhaps in an
>> attachment?  And add " We would appreciate any comments you may have
>> on the active Working Group  documents."
>>
>> Lou
>
> That is a good idea.
> Here are some candidates for that list, I think thet the ITU will be
> interested
> in their status:
>
> draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm
> draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection
> draft-ietf-mpls-rmr
>
> Best regards, Huub.
>
>

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status