[mpls] comments on draft-saad-mpls-lsp-instant-install-rsvpte
Kireeti Kompella <kireeti.kompella@gmail.com> Wed, 04 November 2015 01:30 UTC
Return-Path: <kireeti.kompella@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BF61A6FD1 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:30:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AIfyg9Vp6D2D for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:30:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x233.google.com (mail-io0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 526241A6FC8 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:30:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iody8 with SMTP id y8so38636446iod.1 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 17:30:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QivmD3LvKcTztPRR4QSo84SNOTo0k6hBnf37UYV6GJU=; b=qEyHF4YyMpQ9xEGYLcueK2Ljpjsh9cQAR9cOjm9RbeAg66klL+HvVFRMpbX4MsxBES Fsx9Ql7sB6PmsyGNt93A2yknbL9djzODbHkCXptSj/4Ww9ztKjtYDr6Z3p/8GWwkjnv0 MpAlHsvgKK96xXfBfqUuNjXBuG/PzhLIToukFHuWkSaHTz7vv08Dp39KT0K4K9TVrL49 630wDwPAWuYGEzOhRwvMZCyz7cQhfk3h/ClIife/kdyfV06Rn91shiK9D2+iZ2UJsJYm DJ+k6sCes+6OfMaWUT6IRhRVoCvEazQxFjvrihLirMIhYv8ccE3AjdWgYjRS64VBPWtu /9aw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.6.23 with SMTP id 23mr214133iog.147.1446600646681; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 17:30:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.5.37 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:30:46 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 17:30:46 -0800
Message-ID: <CABRz93XdSopiz_cC_XzgotKQoq0taEnzURLC+T55Cw7bqjaj9g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti.kompella@gmail.com>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113f8e7ead6d830523acf5a4"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/qB2BuSE47B4ET5sKNThitM7t3Ck>
Subject: [mpls] comments on draft-saad-mpls-lsp-instant-install-rsvpte
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 01:30:48 -0000
Hi Tarek, George: I appreciate (but don't fully agree with) your motivation -- to minimize time on the temporary path. This could be the backup path in the case of FRR, or the original path in case of reoptimization. On the other hand, I think some might be worried about the number of forwarding changes: from original path to temporary to DLL stack to final path. Each forwarding change can lead to some packets being dropped or reordered. So, perhaps the objective function being optimized should be to minimize forwarding changes rather than minimize time on the temporary path. At the very least, there should be a discussion of this in the draft (and on the list). -- Kireeti
- [mpls] comments on draft-saad-mpls-lsp-instant-in… Kireeti Kompella
- Re: [mpls] comments on draft-saad-mpls-lsp-instan… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] comments on draft-saad-mpls-lsp-instan… Tarek Saad (tsaad)