IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: Poll: IOAM and PSD

Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> Wed, 14 August 2024 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58706C151082; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 06:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b5dPqyeQolnK; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 06:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x832.google.com (mail-qt1-x832.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::832]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4729C14F704; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 06:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x832.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-451b7e1d157so36597511cf.3; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 06:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1723642865; x=1724247665; darn=ietf.org; h=mime-version:content-language:accept-language:in-reply-to :references:message-id:date:thread-index:thread-topic:subject:cc:to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dE9Rl2vM0TR+Miv4Ysm02zAMc1TQm5H7Dhr998xLSDA=; b=MaUMBmscHA6OEySNmee7vCEQvXgxS4Heoo8gooLXiTUKHXb1/6C0eZdPKc2UttSdZW LZ7hmG8owO9CjejCwX/cHr/E92YtptGwEZE8fZE0FwBVP8lYZCso7wafJP2HFJXaUtvx MV5LNe/J0NGMtOhQHeVI01XCwSQeGuzpxzq1EnvhNCCspnOq9GTJm25CcpqdPEIWHiU/ 2M1aT+7f96437VP+6UeL6l1dMt4umiaV/yXz0OIHkziy9sWc6hzTGbN76oYPcJNDCfIB GJ+aJzLA2F7T4r3UW9GhLEXsTdufYRNXBv/JAAcHmi4mLLr1SbSToCSSTq5qDE3oBZUX 32XQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723642865; x=1724247665; h=mime-version:content-language:accept-language:in-reply-to :references:message-id:date:thread-index:thread-topic:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dE9Rl2vM0TR+Miv4Ysm02zAMc1TQm5H7Dhr998xLSDA=; b=g3UeDOGEJPoWTfeYql6QEOV+ss+t4LWoMvkdTai0tAxS2VjZCtEacSK+3U/nekEDLE Gebgxiit4LGZtrCZ0Pd3JaF1P4eTTBH8XVhH4psGuyBJ9GhfFLSbQJyqlepwP/ZAMrYj CuqJqGjD4Cv+GxuAJyTHcWrAr82o9d0fsEok7MxnLC+hZQmG2lHJB3GR/+uPfksYpCaC BU8EEsGhqnjmyJRaxF9JuZcSJoBVrID3ET7yIpISL9Qy3Uhwz1X6H8Kjsyz9qHdojca4 jSxp5JjgCRnc9y0t9pRDML3lIQYvLRsZLbWQNOgBktQx3AV7016ZdW0mYBYmyT04UA32 qR1A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyjjg6VwY5yVxlzqAz5sFXmB+EfWBWz8Hvn0beUnPcmfRRGn8BH oJFYBH3w8gB1f4/KE+YZ9Qq9W+4SG2ORkY921IH71ESiPm8WwZv6edyCH5XY
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH0iJ56U5aaps9TAdadk4Lk9iiyrb69+dj2KnSm8DIAwwQfmNybJhviQrTVpT/MF9WI2jgqpg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:4d87:b0:446:5ac5:f9dd with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-4535ba9f6c0mr28324441cf.14.1723642864529; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 06:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([2603:1036:5:f::5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d75a77b69052e-4531c1dec0dsm41746151cf.53.2024.08.14.06.41.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Aug 2024 06:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
To: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Poll: IOAM and PSD
Thread-Index: ATc4QzRCIyqOGPxPebNC/KQ+bO8yfcdsGAVi
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 13:41:02 +0000
Message-ID: <DS0PR19MB6501C2C805B65C532B46263FFC872@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
References: <F78CB19B-2880-48AB-99CE-D46280014A87@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <F78CB19B-2880-48AB-99CE-D46280014A87@tony.li>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-CA
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RecordReviewCfmType: 0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_DS0PR19MB6501C2C805B65C532B46263FFC872DS0PR19MB6501namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: JY2NHHDI7JNM6NMXY3MRYLMSINK6Y274
X-Message-ID-Hash: JY2NHHDI7JNM6NMXY3MRYLMSINK6Y274
X-MailFrom: tsaad.net@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: MPLS Working Chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: Poll: IOAM and PSD
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/qHBCt-X17u_VLIbuJuuS22C-ru8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

Dear WG,

This poll is now closed. Thanks to everyone who responded.
Attached are the collected responses to the poll. Feel free to respond if you think changes need to be made.
The chairs will meet to discuss further those responses and will share with the WG further updates.

Regards,
Tarek (for MPLS chairs)


From: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com> on behalf of Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2024 at 11:26 AM
To: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Poll: IOAM and PSD

[WG chair hat: on]



Hi all,



We’ve had many discussions about IOAM and PSD over the last few years. We need to reach consensus on the problems that need to be addressed in these areas. Therefore, we would like to hear from everyone, especially independent operators:



  1.  There are many flavors of IOAM.  Which ones would you like to deploy/implement with MNA?
  2.  Do you have other applications of MNA that have not been proposed yet?



 This poll will close in two weeks, at 9am PDT, Aug 13.



Regards,

MPLS chairs

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status