Return-Path: X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D9212013F; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:24:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.997 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YVkR8dcWkG1F; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:24:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ot1-x32d.google.com (mail-ot1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06FE11200FB; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:24:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id 103so12713240otd.9; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 10:24:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4KGguUdTJmnLRPEd8Uek8DnuBu7IsmhCjcPrVTBXIh0=; b=KyHGHuVLG5IjoqUagZNA2zuGS01OBuPhbuXkUHA8BO3WRRhs5piMFejHwrQMbi7ZZi SB5BviMZTGhuOEiy4YwtdFRLuu7fpC7ZMaWoZkVWki6ffHxcTg08cJKikIztqVbtMp3O mTu4jRRZZucFS9OhQVTHb+xY0VCKbAC/KsbwKKb6NfntIQ6i3XloxurBifXOlXyUfZFH P0Agv5MfWbYqkBYZKZxFiVeuixoXNTuoi1qs2cuAyehruyJ5qAwTkhj7WhD49xj871pY vocOE+dSPLNNW2D4Z4ATiUHeNnfrxdy6jvfQsKBS59/y/4hkvPAgFaFv4weidFbSR4xc EmLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4KGguUdTJmnLRPEd8Uek8DnuBu7IsmhCjcPrVTBXIh0=; b=LxYzQRudrYpg5ivwhSxOAGCSnVvFC5XkNLhOzwGPhx2j/nojqpTOpItwujp4lRrNcX m0a4Qn7i7m0+2/5R/qNJgb8T70Wcul3lKuxRGtAOAV2KpXZZDHtUi9SpAoGLI62nTd7K aK3aR6ousgQZElBFXG/UuSC2XCoxO0fdYU9N0orumsbJCbScWbOe9OAbF9GfPXI6aQvj 960o4Kd3bh8jHGDT3YhP/AhDiKYf114ZHEDLNP8AVpQGtA3qfnEdi6bcSvRXXGI0k3Z3 KGSQ0wO22uRNiCMDgfYUXQOhWIq8gD6x3kKfOr8PD+DoLj+cTLUl76ZjKhBhXBzEtQqa v7nw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUCLr2RRie6j+18w5KpC4zJb3JJqi81P4YwO+tZTbxpj24MU3dK EnmfI2prrGlLCX3g0zPrpz6JA66XCmjOIln+f9k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzoMWJ9HCoPpIHnOL9WLg522Sbp8MUG0JkCVdbJekhHV19mGBdzPrkCdHM3sIC1h/xYjDs2ZiclOjoIl2GwhAc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1103:: with SMTP id w3mr53126750otq.28.1554225849200; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 10:24:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 13:24:08 -0400 From: Alvaro Retana In-Reply-To: References: <155208210011.3264.12148702952456660789.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 13:24:08 -0400 Message-ID: To: Mach Chen Cc: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" , "mpls@ietf.org" , The IESG , "draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath@ietf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a4761105858f6761" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [mpls] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-06: (with COMMENT) X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 17:24:15 -0000 --000000000000a4761105858f6761 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes, that works for me. If we do that, we don=E2=80=99t need the reference= to rfc8029. :-) On April 1, 2019 at 10:42:27 PM, Mach Chen (mach.chen@huawei.com) wrote: How about just remove the mandatory/optional, not to emphasize whether it is mandatory or optional, then it may reduce some confusion when others read it in the future, just as the =E2=80=9CDownstream Detailed Mapping T= LV=E2=80=9D does, : This document defines a new TLV (RFC8029, Section 3) which is referred to as the "LSR Capability TLV. It MAY be included=E2=80=A6 --000000000000a4761105858f6761 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =
Yes, that works for me.=C2=A0 If we do that, we don=E2= =80=99t need the reference to rfc8029. :-)

On April = 1, 2019 at 10:42:27 PM, Mach Chen (= mach.chen@huawei.com) wrote:

How about just remove the mandatory/optional, not to emphasize wh= ether it is mandatory or optional, then it may reduce some confusion when o= thers read it in the future, =C2=A0=C2=A0just as the =E2=80=9CDownstream De= tailed Mapping TLV=E2=80=9D does, =C2=A0:

=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0This document defines a new TLV (RFC8029, Section 3) w= hich is=C2=A0

=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0referred to as the &q= uot;LSR Capability TLV.=C2=A0=C2=A0It MAY be included=E2=80=A6


--000000000000a4761105858f6761--