IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] FW: Correction - IPR poll on draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Wed, 26 August 2015 13:17 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E9A1A19F7 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 06:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nZxDfDCTjbVJ for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 06:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 942971A1F70 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 06:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.103] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92E5E1802AB1; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:17:28 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <55DDBC65.3040703@pi.nu>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:17:25 +0200
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "George Swallow (swallow)" <swallow@cisco.com>
References: <CAFqGwGsc7kVavk5ijh24usXE54dSXV=Hkhz0VUHPLBmsnJjWzQ@mail.gmail.com> <D1F8F86B.3ED94%swallow@cisco.com> <D2033057.11DA31%swallow@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2033057.11DA31%swallow@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/qRJqcFQSu-weZJNK0NmvxqpqSkw>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] FW: Correction - IPR poll on draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:17:36 -0000

George,

Yes - you did, sorry. I had mis-filed the mail.

/Loa

On 2015-08-26 15:03, George Swallow (swallow) wrote:
> Loa -
>
> Actually, I did.
>
> George
>
> From: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com <mailto:swallow@cisco.com>>
> Date: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 2:58 PM
> To: Nobo Akiya <nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com
> <mailto:nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com>>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu
> <mailto:loa@pi.nu>>
> Cc: "mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>" <mpls@ietf.org
> <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> <mailto:mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> <mailto:mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>>,
> "draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@tools.ietf.org
> <mailto:draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@tools.ietf.org>"
> <draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@tools.ietf.org
> <mailto:draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@tools.ietf.org>>
> Subject: Re: Correction - [mpls] IPR poll on
> draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping
>
> I am not aware of any IPR on this document.
>
> George
>
> From: Nobo Akiya <nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com
> <mailto:nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com>>
> Date: Saturday, August 15, 2015 11:30 PM
> To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu <mailto:loa@pi.nu>>
> Cc: "mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>" <mpls@ietf.org
> <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> <mailto:mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> <mailto:mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>>,
> "draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@tools.ietf.org
> <mailto:draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@tools.ietf.org>"
> <draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@tools.ietf.org
> <mailto:draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@tools.ietf.org>>
> Subject: Re: Correction - [mpls] IPR poll on
> draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping
> Resent-From: <wg-alias-bounces@tools.ietf.org
> <mailto:wg-alias-bounces@tools.ietf.org>>
> Resent-To: <draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@ietf.org
> <mailto:draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@ietf.org>>,
> <mpls-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:mpls-chairs@ietf.org>>
> Resent-Date: Saturday, August 15, 2015 11:30 PM
>
>     Hi Loa,
>
>     I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this document.
>
>     Regards,
>     Nobo
>
>     On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu
>     <mailto:loa@pi.nu>> wrote:
>
>         Folks,
>
>         One of the authors of the document has found an error with the text
>         of the IPR Poll mail, thanks Nagendra! When you respond to the
>         IPR poll
>         please respond to this mail (nothing bad will happen if you respond
>         to the original mail :) ).
>
>         The correct text should be:
>
>         Working Group,
>
>         We have started to prepare draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-lsp-ping for
>         working group adoption poll (can I use the abbreviation wgap?)
>
>         We will start with the IPR poll and then MPLS-RT and the poll.
>
>         This mail starts the IPR poll.
>
>         Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
>         draft-kumarkini-mpls-spring-
>         lsp-ping?
>
>         If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>         (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
>         There no IPR disclosures filed against this document.
>
>         If you are listed as a document author or contributor please
>         respond to
>         this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any
>         relevant
>         IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing
>         list.* The
>         document will not advance to the next stage until a response has
>         been
>         received from each author and contributor.
>
>         If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an
>         author or
>         contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are
>         aware of any
>         IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>
>         /Loa
>         mpls wg co-chair
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email