Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Wed, 02 March 2016 05:13 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74831B48CF for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 21:13:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5oCiYAyCXjE6 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 21:13:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A884D1B48CE for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 21:13:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.13] (unknown [112.205.81.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2FEE18029FB for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 06:13:54 +0100 (CET)
To: mpls@ietf.org
References: <56CAD781.3070207@pi.nu>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <56D6768B.8070008@pi.nu>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 13:13:47 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56CAD781.3070207@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/rD3Cv0bdItWubPKn697j_biNQPI>
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 05:14:00 -0000

Working Group,

We had Nobo's reply to the IPR poll quite soon after starting the
wglc. The text should now say:

"All the authors and contributors have stated on the working group
  mailing list that they are not aware of any other IPRs than what
  has already been disclosed that relates to this draft."

The wglc will be closed March 08, 2016.

/Loa


On 2016-02-22 17:40, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> This is to initiate a two week working group last call on
> draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping.
>
> Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list (mpls@ietf.org).
>
> There are three IPR disclosures against this document.
>
> The document shepherd and working group chairs are frequently asked
> about the working group discussions related to any IPR disclosures.
>
> We like to remind the working group that discussion on the content
> and validity of an IPR disclosure should not take place on the MPLS wg
> list or any IETF mailing lists.
>
> However we are looking for simple statements whether you think the
> working group should continue progress the document, regardless of an
> existing IPR disclosure. Please include this information in your
> "support/do not support" when responding to working group adoption
> calls and last calls.
>
> All the authors and contributors (with one exception) have stated on
> the working group mailing list that they are not aware of any other
> IPRs that relates to this draft.
>
> Note: One of the authors - Nobo - has not responded to the IPR poll, we
> know that in his new role Nobo is an infrequent reader of IETF mails.
> We have decided to go ahead with the wglc, while we continue to ping him
> on the IPR poll. We have a pretty good idea off Nobo's response, but
> should ther be any "surprises" this will be brought to the attention of
> the working group.
>
> This working group last call ends March 08, 2016, however the wglc will
> not be closed until we have all the responses on the IPR poll.
>
>
> /Loa
> for the MPLS wg chairs