[mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp-02
"Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com> Tue, 23 February 2016 15:10 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=5861c03b04=hshah@ciena.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758AE1B326A for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 07:10:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.266
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kc3U8vuD4qy4 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 07:10:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com [67.231.152.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E78361B3268 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 07:10:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0002317.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with SMTP id u1NF2Gek003865; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:10:33 -0500
Received: from vawvcgsie2k1301.ciena.com (lin1-118-36-35.ciena.com [63.118.36.35]) by mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 216n8h931d-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:10:33 -0500
Received: from ONWVEXCHHT01.ciena.com (10.128.6.16) by VAWVCGSIE2K1301.ciena.com (10.4.62.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:10:31 -0500
Received: from ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com ([::1]) by ONWVEXCHHT01.ciena.com ([::1]) with mapi; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:10:31 -0500
From: "Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "Loa Andersson (loa@pi.nu)" <loa@pi.nu>, "Santosh Esale (sesale@juniper.net)" <sesale@juniper.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:10:30 -0500
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp-02
Thread-Index: AdFuTELco4QBocZtTjCxzquL6/almA==
Message-ID: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182BA62B04F2@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.0.0.1412-7.000.1014-22150.000
x-tm-as-result: No--38.079600-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182BA62B04F2ONWVEXCHMB04cie_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-02-23_09:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1601100000 definitions=main-1602230175
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/rQYnLfYu2xnYfpWh8jFERw2dqrs>
Subject: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp-02
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:10:39 -0000
I read this draft and agree that a mechanism is required to protect against onslaught of incoming uninitiated tLDP sessions, either for security or scale reasons. In my view, this work is something WG consider adopting. Thanks, Himanshu
- [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp-02 Shah, Himanshu