IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed-02.txt

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Sat, 26 March 2016 00:39 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1845C12D625 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mKJaF9veSrTv for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FBC212D1D2 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10747; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1458952746; x=1460162346; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=zQxrqCO0jzpjRIsY4pJUhTM5w7b6wDJfuC4le72qLIg=; b=E5lmI4Dp2V0cfxhaymFYYwuzxPyBUl7BsaUv5glo0opO/WDHPkixxiIB GvJelso9Cf1mcPVA4MEnfcnq7HK10ZyihcJXAPVqLFjbXVWGH6brH9gmG gNyHHzOLvZcwKsxlm1WYy8CfrIYN8HgycrQ0IkoYOYDv/Y35jZQzYttY1 Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D/AQB62fVW/xbLJq1egmKBH30GrwqGYIRuAQ2BcBcBC4VqAhyBRxQBAQEBAQEBZCeEQQEBAQMBAQEBIEsLEAIBCBEDAQIoAwICAh8GCxQJCAEBBAENBRuHdwMKCA6wUos/DYRuAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFYEPiVOCPoFfAQEzCg0RgkITgkMFly8xAYVwgi6DLkKBdYFmFjeHJ4UxhzWHVAEPDwEBQoNlbAGHaDZ+AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,393,1454976000"; d="scan'208,217";a="676302165"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Mar 2016 00:39:03 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u2Q0d29d012627 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 26 Mar 2016 00:39:03 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 20:39:01 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 20:39:02 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: George Swallow <swallow.ietf@gmail.com>, Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed-02.txt
Thread-Index: AdGFDYJvzOpZ6BbxTD2LOnYJ8T0PNwCCojuA//+/roA=
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 00:39:02 +0000
Message-ID: <D31B517B.53069%acee@cisco.com>
References: <BLUPR05MB1985B4AEB8DDEAB7D14AF915AE810@BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAAA2pyffaG1c27k93yO=Ocgb3xCGJQhxXmvM-Y5bRsoaQkY_Uw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAA2pyffaG1c27k93yO=Ocgb3xCGJQhxXmvM-Y5bRsoaQkY_Uw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D31B517B53069aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/rUwAzi8GY26lp2I4FBMxPzY1N_Q>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed-02.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 00:39:09 -0000

Hey George,
It is somewhat of an industry standard term so I don’t think we can just change it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_and_non-discriminatory_licensing

On that note, I’m glad I don’t have to worry about FRAN terms with IPR and drafts any more…

Thanks,
Acee

From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of George Swallow <swallow.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:swallow.ietf@gmail.com>>
Date: Friday, March 25, 2016 at 8:29 PM
To: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net<mailto:rbonica@juniper.net>>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>" <mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed-02.txt

With chair hat off, I really hate "reasonable", since there is really no definition of what is "reasonable".  Can we find a way around this?
[https://ssl.gstatic.com/ui/v1/icons/mail/images/cleardot.gif]
George

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net<mailto:rbonica@juniper.net>> wrote:
Ross,

I agree with Adrian's statement, below.

                             Ron

>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:34:36 -0000
> From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk>>
> To: "'Ross Callon'" <rcallon@juniper.net<mailto:rcallon@juniper.net>>, <mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>>
> Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on
>       draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed-02.txt
> Message-ID: <064501d17bbc$49f36110$ddda2330$@olddog.co.uk<http://olddog.co.uk>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Ross, thanks for this notice.
>
> I need to read the IPR referenced by the disclosure, but pending that, I do
> not support this document going forward in its current state.
>
> I think it is important for the working group to seek to develop solutions that
> either completely unencumbered by IPR or that is available on free-to-
> implementers terms. It may turn out that this is not possible with the
> disclosed IPR, but I think the WG should try.
>
> For the avoidance of doubt: I am not making any comment on the IPR-
> holder's rights to impose whatever license they want, and I am not asking
> them to vary their terms.
>
> I do not that it would be convenient if the IPR holder updated the disclosure
> to show that it applies to the current WG draft.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email