Re: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5036 (5587)

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sat, 05 January 2019 09:44 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A38C130E51 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:44:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tu7tATy64nFR for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:44:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4309128CB7 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:44:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.20] (unknown [119.94.172.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAE0A1801591; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 10:44:03 +0100 (CET)
To: db3546@att.com
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, Ina Minei <inaminei@google.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, n.leymann@telekom.de, ramakrishnadtv@gmail.com, mpls@ietf.org
References: <20181228045757.C391EB80E7F@rfc-editor.org>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <1a18bde2-f2a0-722a-f619-7d0f58b76458@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2019 17:43:27 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20181228045757.C391EB80E7F@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/rY0rOxFshNMKHcQrM3LiPlBj6Fk>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5036 (5587)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2019 09:44:12 -0000

Deborah,

I've discussed with Adrian, and we agree that the errata is correct,
however it is very minor and does not really effect the reading of
the document.

Classify it as "grammar/editorial" and keep it for a potential update.

/Loa

On 2018-12-28 12:57, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5036,
> "LDP Specification".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5587
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Ramakrishna Rao DTV <ramakrishnadtv@gmail.com>;
> 
> Section: 2.6.2.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>    "In Downstream Unsolicited advertisement mode, label mapping
>     advertisements for all routes may be received from all LDP peers.
>     When using Liberal Label retention, every label mappings received
>     from a peer LSR is retained regardless of whether the LSR is the next
>     hop for the advertised mapping..."
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    "In Downstream Unsolicited advertisement mode, label mapping
>     advertisements for all routes may be received from all LDP peers.
>     When using Liberal Label retention, every label mapping received
>     from a peer LSR is retained regardless of whether the LSR is the next
>     hop for the advertised mapping..."
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> s/mappings/mapping/
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5036 (draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3036bis-04)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : LDP Specification
> Publication Date    : October 2007
> Author(s)           : L. Andersson, Ed., I. Minei, Ed., B. Thomas, Ed.
> Category            : DRAFT STANDARD
> Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64