IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] draft-atlas-mpls-te-express-path-02 (was MPLS-RT review of ...)

Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com> Wed, 24 April 2013 01:44 UTC

Return-Path: <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7AC21F9120 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.489
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.489 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.110, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bbmgKgt9bUrV for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED4421F90F1 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AQS97933; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 01:44:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:43:44 +0100
Received: from NKGEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.39) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:44:12 +0100
Received: from NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.243]) by nkgeml408-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.39]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:44:07 +0800
From: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
To: "curtis@ipv6.occnc.com" <curtis@ipv6.occnc.com>, MPLS WG Mailing List <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-atlas-mpls-te-express-path authors <draft-atlas-mpls-te-express-path@tools.ietf.org>, The Great and Mighty MPLS Co-Chairs <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] draft-atlas-mpls-te-express-path-02 (was MPLS-RT review of ...)
Thread-Index: AQHOQEQNQ9iL0cl/nUiQqrZZEVUQipjklSUQ
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 01:44:05 +0000
Message-ID: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE07F6409D@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <201304231658.r3NGwjGK063708@gateway1.orleans.occnc.com>
In-Reply-To: <201304231658.r3NGwjGK063708@gateway1.orleans.occnc.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.98.130]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [mpls] draft-atlas-mpls-te-express-path-02 (was MPLS-RT review of ...)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 01:44:16 -0000

>     s/While it has been possible to compute a CSPF/It is possible to
>     compute a CSPF/
>     s/Instead of this approach to minimize path latency, an/An
>     alternative to this approach to minimize path latency is an
>     approach to place a upper bound on path latency.  An/
>     Note: both approaches are valid.

I think the alternative approach (i.e., to compute a CSPF path based on the TE metric while placing a upper bound on the path latency) is not a practical approach due to computationally complexity.

Best regards,
Xiaohu

v2.45.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status