[mpls] Re: Request WG adoption for draft-jags-mpls-ps-mna-hdr-03.txt

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

Jags, authors, chairs, working group,


I support making draft-jags-mpls-ps-mna-hdr a working group document.

It has repeatedly been said by those who want ISD-solutions that 
PSD-solutions ar not needed.

I think this is a fundamentally flawed way of asking the question.

- if we have a choice between two solutions and they are equally good
   for all cases, then it makes sense to try to find consensus for adopting
   one of the solutions
- if we have a choice between two solutions there both solutions "can 
do" all
   cases, but there one is significantly better for one set of cases and 
the
   other is significantly better for the remaining cases, we should cases we
    should seriously consider going for two solutions.
- if we we have the a choice between two solutions there one can solve 
part of
   the cases and the other the remaining cases, the we need to go for two
   solutions.

/Loa


Den 2024-06-26 kl. 04:50, skrev Jaganbabu Rajamanickam (jrajaman):
>
> Hello Chairs,
>
>    We would like to request WG adoption for draft-jags-mpls-ps-mna-hdr.
>
>    Updated the draft with the initial review comments and the latest 
> MNA header format.
>
>   Welcome your review comments and suggestions.
>
> Thanx,
>
> Jags
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]

-- 
Loa Andersson
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting
[e-mail]
[e-mail]