Re: [mpls] [spring] Updates to draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls

"Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com> Fri, 24 May 2019 19:30 UTC

Return-Path: <rgandhi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CDB81200F3; Fri, 24 May 2019 12:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=TqgMNZHw; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=o/yTb4oJ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dxe1NRMCmhYM; Fri, 24 May 2019 12:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 293F812006A; Fri, 24 May 2019 12:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3282; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1558726235; x=1559935835; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=Rn3AHu/KxmdZgfWAGYAB060vvxKbZC0RCHpyXkoTIKs=; b=TqgMNZHw2W3zw6fRyBfJrFRD47En2kSthXW3a44kgK3HdrgnjIN1AuDM hx0xc3OpxfphRMpK0Rpsk0GguD4++7ZShH0HlZhBFzWYgVv3on3OnUnc5 PnDaxNRLCIJxoxeFBVZPp+M5frzui84Epa3dIeJfC4sE9HXAxgr9VLbib o=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:FrjTcxSAiN/5UqVRVAFB+Y3L7Npsv++ubAcI9poqja5Pea2//pPkeVbS/uhpkESXBdfA8/wRje3QvuigQmEG7Zub+FE6OJ1XH15g640NmhA4RsuMCEn1NvnvOjY1FcJOVF5N9HCgOk8TE8H7NBXf
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BoAABERehc/5BdJa1lHQEBBQEHBQGBUQgBCwGBPVADaVUgBAsohBODRwOEUoongjIllyqBLhSBEANUCQEBAQwBARgLCgIBAYN6RgIXgigjNAkOAQMBAQQBAQIBBG0cDIVLAQEBAwEBEBERDAEBKQMLAQ0CAgEIGAICJgICAhkMCxUQAgQBDQUigwABgWoDHQECDJp1AoE4iF9xgS+CeQEBBYFGQUCCPBiCDwMGBYEHKAGLUheBQD+BEScME4JMPoJhAQEDAYEqARIBNiOCUDKCJotTgjaaQgkCgg2GM4xfG4IfhmONP4xogSiFWI5tAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFPOGZxcBU7KgGCQYIPg3CFFIU/coEpiyGCQwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,508,1549929600"; d="scan'208";a="567349309"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 24 May 2019 19:30:32 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-006.cisco.com (xch-aln-006.cisco.com [173.36.7.16]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x4OJUVtT000850 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 May 2019 19:30:32 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by XCH-ALN-006.cisco.com (173.36.7.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 24 May 2019 14:30:30 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 24 May 2019 14:30:30 -0500
Received: from NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 24 May 2019 14:30:29 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Rn3AHu/KxmdZgfWAGYAB060vvxKbZC0RCHpyXkoTIKs=; b=o/yTb4oJVjNezFQbot4GXiu4YhTInhkkSzMDixXbgOJQ9G61m6jGJ/9nvJISNsizOJZeT6ofqSo1UJ9fQscertsHHeOdSC9bpndO4zQ4mADhzcXr/5s+sHlB/02+DaFMTrPcyaJInjxy6w1ogGfjiGSsVdHXmq556rYPgqI04qE=
Received: from BYAPR11MB2984.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.177.224.140) by BYAPR11MB3304.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.177.185.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1900.20; Fri, 24 May 2019 19:30:29 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB2984.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2863:4b36:aa13:ef82]) by BYAPR11MB2984.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2863:4b36:aa13:ef82%7]) with mapi id 15.20.1922.019; Fri, 24 May 2019 19:30:29 +0000
From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
CC: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] Updates to draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls
Thread-Index: AQHVECdtBVPl6z/FYk2dRFHqcESRSKZ2shSAgAO41oA=
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 19:30:28 +0000
Message-ID: <7E2C91E0-F1FA-4EAD-8730-A0DAB4FFA07A@cisco.com>
References: <529B3159-882E-4469-9DAC-F8AB3C9CD1F2@cisco.com> <ee52e04e-7050-74e4-9846-7609d13b8197@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <ee52e04e-7050-74e4-9846-7609d13b8197@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.a.190512
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rgandhi@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c4:1006::383]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 090ea474-4690-4425-82f7-08d6e07e478c
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600141)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR11MB3304;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB3304:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB330494D254558EC5AC61C146BF020@BYAPR11MB3304.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0047BC5ADE
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(136003)(376002)(366004)(39860400002)(346002)(396003)(189003)(199004)(6246003)(4326008)(15650500001)(186003)(25786009)(81166006)(486006)(8936002)(8676002)(81156014)(83716004)(66446008)(66556008)(102836004)(2201001)(33656002)(229853002)(58126008)(86362001)(110136005)(14454004)(5660300002)(6486002)(14444005)(256004)(71200400001)(478600001)(6116002)(99286004)(316002)(73956011)(66946007)(91956017)(76116006)(76176011)(36756003)(53546011)(64756008)(66476007)(966005)(6436002)(6506007)(2616005)(305945005)(2501003)(68736007)(7736002)(11346002)(446003)(476003)(6306002)(6512007)(71190400001)(2906002)(82746002)(53936002)(46003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR11MB3304; H:BYAPR11MB2984.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 1LQga9Q87wqKG5w9jy6CLnv+hD2RXhJPC5RW6vMrPdFa2x6KsWlsFfS+yxs9H3jjAY1e0A7YYxH7pHbbK2bcMofCNgM6BOsAp7Yi2imVS338SCKxT+3MwhvrveZDnW7/EAT5Uzy170gcyVgFqCkCgM+qWtO5/LGpvRgr/6naiKEnLI3/XFXF4nu19scUeYSbsDb/crYZAbvwDkWTuzJVE8gSdryVqrOzQZJ8M5AjPWLuNn2CJgOugotLkJhYV5b/ihhD24UwG3BpYNTuxrmKM9y9koOpQ9ulTOdYZ6GkPn36rZWoII1dso8CQgfxe1zuaMTz4v8eYRwNMXnUfWQyX7s+++7eDIrCtZFdezLANAkaFFT742nvrWkgJDkSHLf80IxVUXUo2Nm0beDFgX5TZIFbJMGUiWWCYJk1k0qQowQ=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <8D6CC4D0411E92479396224C9F6C0436@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 090ea474-4690-4425-82f7-08d6e07e478c
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 May 2019 19:30:28.9296 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB3304
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.16, xch-aln-006.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-8.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/rpkDAiKAHjVlnXSsP_1RPY4O1cg>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] Updates to draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 19:30:38 -0000

Hi Loa,

Thank you for the review comments. Please see inline with <RG>...

On 2019-05-22, 2:40 AM, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu> wrote:

    
    Rakesh,
    
    A couple of thoughts and questions.
    
    - is it necessary to have three different ways to establish the
       IOAM Indicator Label?

<RG> There are three options possible, but after some discussions with the WGs, we can pick one or more.

    - if it is necessary to use a Special Purpose Label, could you use
       a eSPL instead of a bSPL (for terminology see draft-andersson-mpls-
       spl-terminology)?

<RG> We can use eSL (e.g. label value 18).

    - will the label serving as as IOAM Indicator always be a the bottom
       of the stack and have the s-bit set?

<RG> That may be easier, need to see if there is any complication that can come with it though.

    - allocating SPL's is a decision that I would want the MPLS working
       group to take, this could be done in one of two ways, either we
       progress in the mpls wg or you split out the IANA allocation in a
       separate document and progress that in the mpls wg.

<RG> Ok. At this time, we can keep both WGs in the loop with one document.

Thanks,
Rakesh

    
    /Loa
    
    On 2019-05-22 06:49, Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) wrote:
    > Hi WG,
    > 
    > We have published an update to the following draft:
    > 
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls/
    > 
    > /draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls/ defines how IOAM data fields are 
    > transported with SR-MPLS encapsulation. The draft has been updated as 
    > following://
    > 
    >  1. Add different methods of IOAM Indicator Label in Section 4.1.
    >  2. Add Hashing function in Section 4.2.
    >  3. Add Node capability in Section 4.3.
    >  4. Cleanup/editorial changes
    > 
    > Welcome your review comments and suggestions.
    > 
    > Thanks,
    > 
    > Rakesh (on behalf of co-authors and contributors)
    > 
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > spring mailing list
    > spring@ietf.org
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
    > 
    
    -- 
    
    
    Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
    Senior MPLS Expert
    Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64