IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: Poll: IOAM and PSD

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Mon, 19 August 2024 15:10 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E88C180B4D; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.758
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.758 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CtByPS6IIfVE; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1029.google.com (mail-pj1-x1029.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1029]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0500C151083; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1029.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2d3b595c18dso3305205a91.0; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1724080200; x=1724685000; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:sender:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=q4fylBbhvkJ9yWo3w6R+dUxLq9wnO4IS0Q7STyPXLAk=; b=UKXmyqMNoUSA7/gngNiU642amBHLPQ54MKBYDH6nXQM9xFItx0QeLB9wyrevxQiKeg jLysUtyP4YzuQ+2hktv0sFBK9cgXRo/AvTm4zUyyi1VTMk4o9HzC2HFqVXoobv5nC/Xe lkuUMZtLWJCt7eCXIApChh0zICm/cHT5ZbCM0/ft6EoJEGFypanerH//wgfVVQDpyYb9 +XTCCNfL+TT8XD27CSA0S7OLUxe9JadpUi80lZ/pDD5GLNSOsqpmQNPonGc2N3ANE+Ym PZxSsWuooDav/JiDh0uLrl3svIQ7vkzCD8hGkPJxb14irPf7u/mdKIZa+Ptq1KU7WdzT L3EA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1724080200; x=1724685000; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:sender:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=q4fylBbhvkJ9yWo3w6R+dUxLq9wnO4IS0Q7STyPXLAk=; b=YQjSn8I8PnMcZCBNr9cTXwr5w2M44OYWBTxnZKgV70CP1eg4p9GIaWNUUuNTcvzBrV Ffy1lCCupaqg4hGYPrxknTSZc8wkWvhAc9gJbJ8Tx+6hMABX9QBh6ZMwb/EJLrLLLcxM L3BGSsUQRw6qwaFa8bGuhJPcpLA785EntY6GkRBi3f40fdSr1erhZE6bwfRrVAJvFhGI upzcB6S+bN4CFvKpeeYH+24QREm4FThOLElin7AN6KM/RZI6QxUQlCK1Yd+QlNglkuS6 eVIFRyGImC+t3zpST9jHB8h/ONxAGSj/qMb3vy1xf9CbEiboZwq3CuWHUr/xf2hiw2aJ 2ueA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXEDEegFxSZ7WUEVkOcHYoZ/+pfX7M3HNYwQ98MtrdacHxuC01et58aSXBDFWlTnCUV5gE9GDRddC8oVAUAU/KVw2dDr5CiIoSht9nIzlqfQr6pmg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyUIwNpFI7bg1fdZ0kOvzZw3OGLyA1y0orlknxOVx9zI5DvMN1g QUDdyvU37YtlK5SRLO93fAA0GxxmB/0MGGRY0IOLO4pvRZjd7git
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IETOHby3u/l7Hn/hhWZ1XtMxjgLHlPmg+JPcHLK4Cvjre7iWB6VWPjqHZEoln1zg4X6s9QiMg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1083:b0:2cb:4c30:51bd with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2d3e45f6011mr16819542a91.19.1724080199984; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-73-93-167-4.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.93.167.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2d40080384esm5536675a91.44.2024.08.19.08.09.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51\))
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <393bd232-bac1-44c6-9cae-3c087bd692c7@pi.nu>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:09:48 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AA32CC75-78DF-4B1F-95F1-ECA76FDC2686@tony.li>
References: <F78CB19B-2880-48AB-99CE-D46280014A87@tony.li> <DS0PR19MB6501C2C805B65C532B46263FFC872@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <71045c16-caa6-4875-a2c4-c50d0484eda1@pi.nu> <393bd232-bac1-44c6-9cae-3c087bd692c7@pi.nu>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51)
Message-ID-Hash: HR4JDKVGM6BXE6DFHXFCXJEEK7KAYJOE
X-Message-ID-Hash: HR4JDKVGM6BXE6DFHXFCXJEEK7KAYJOE
X-MailFrom: tony1athome@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: Poll: IOAM and PSD
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/rz5xfZMbCTu8mMsuwlzQge363GE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

[WG chair hat: on]

Hi Loa,

I am trying to make progress in a step-wise fashion.  

Before doing a WGAP on that document, it would make sense for the WG to decide whether or not it needs a PSD solution. 
If we do not need a PSD solution, then there is no point in a WGAP for any PSD document.

Before doing a consensus call on whether we need PSD, we should have an open and honest debate about whether
we need PSD. The chairs are discussing how to initiate that debate right now.

Tony




> On Aug 19, 2024, at 3:00 AM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:
> 
> Tarek, working group,
> 
> Joel pointed out to me that I have an abbreviation error in my mail, it should say WGAP not WGLC.
> 
> Tnx, Joel!
> 
> /Loa
> 
> Den 19/08/2024 kl. 14:56, skrev Loa Andersson:
>> Tarek,
>> 
>> With the result as it is captured in the spreadsheet, can we at least get the WGLC process for draft-jags-mpls-ps-mna-hdr started?
>> 
>> /Loa
>> 
>> Den 14/08/2024 kl. 21:41, skrev Tarek Saad:
>>> 
>>> Dear WG,
>>> 
>>> This poll is now closed. Thanks to everyone who responded.
>>> 
>>> Attached are the collected responses to the poll. Feel free to respond if you think changes need to be made.
>>> 
>>> The chairs will meet to discuss further those responses and will share with the WG further updates.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Tarek (for MPLS chairs)
>>> 
>>> *From: *Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com> on behalf of Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
>>> *Date: *Tuesday, July 30, 2024 at 11:26 AM
>>> *To: *mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
>>> *Subject: *[mpls] Poll: IOAM and PSD
>>> 
>>> [WG chair hat: on]
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> We’ve had many discussions about IOAM and PSD over the last few years. We need to reach consensus on the problems that need to be addressed in these areas. Therefore, we would like to hear from everyone, especially independent operators:
>>> 
>>>  1. There are many flavors of IOAM.  Which ones would you like to
>>>     deploy/implement with MNA?
>>>  2. Do you have other applications of MNA that have not been proposed yet?
>>> 
>>>  This poll will close in two weeks, at 9am PDT, Aug 13.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> MPLS chairs
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpls mailing list -- mpls@ietf.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to mpls-leave@ietf.org
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Loa Andersson
> Senior MPLS Expert
> Bronze Dragon Consulting
> loa@pi.nu
> loa.pi.nu.@gmail.com
>

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status