IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Heads Up - Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6428 (3629) and RFC6428 (4415)

Alice Russo <arusso@amsl.com> Fri, 17 July 2015 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <arusso@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F2BB1B2FAE for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5n5KynhvcR0L for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698861B2FA6 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC561E52BD; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qk7v67YINiqI; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.3] (c-73-35-192-216.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [73.35.192.216]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 274B11E52BC; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Alice Russo <arusso@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <55A7E40B.1050101@pi.nu>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:49:42 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9DE89329-96C5-4381-8F39-B00031D992E1@amsl.com>
References: <20130521141350.EF4F862100@rfc-editor.org> <55A60407.9060108@pi.nu> <E6C17D2345AC7A45B7D054D407AA205C4AF13A1D@eusaamb105.ericsson.se> <55A78CE8.9090100@cisco.com> <E6C17D2345AC7A45B7D054D407AA205C4AF1417E@eusaamb105.ericsson.se> <55A7E40B.1050101@pi.nu>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/s41r-g0kFIdOlSAs7SYHNwwQM_M>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "rcallon@juniper.net" <rcallon@juniper.net>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "alan.davey@metaswitch.com" <alan.davey@metaswitch.com>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Heads Up - Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6428 (3629) and RFC6428 (4415)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 19:49:46 -0000

Loa wrote:
> We also have an old erratum RFC6428 (3629), this was verified back in
> 2013. If we want to reopen this we will need a new errata.

Actually, rather than report a new one, we suggest correcting the existing erratum. To do this, simply send a request to the RFC Editor that the existing one be reopened. Then, it can be edited as needed by the verifying party (in this case, an AD).

Thank you.
RFC Editor/ar

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email