Re: [mpls] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte-07

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 19 February 2020 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DE1120072; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:01:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=sTOmoVFo; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=bQmL88kB
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CzPLqhx8J1zA; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:01:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FFCA1201EF; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:01:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480A75D0; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:01:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:01:50 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=q lRG45EjJlal2WF7aU+9/tgzsKAWS4bXP2UgVB6orE8=; b=sTOmoVFoQthkA2ss2 YmKhJd++ayeyipkz7fWd6w3PAqd+EAEQFOu3Q7pb0BUWMXZ3P7DfiWyW+Qse0QkO 2O3wVyauQVjftki7VYateza48PkBW7guDuThjMqFB5OOEAwIDvfmg8aDTp25msv7 IHV2XmmeSaU9N/CrCbkWcilkaSFtxhs6F+dkIOFn6BjyNiJrzYPu4LveBtUzQQ7m XUVET1wendd1ErOZieRUBUzElj2dNjGnsYkxB3SlIfEVf2I4ezSQOEG6RI4xsq4S vVPmtxnGjzR5A8V71RSNFhL8nM/+ocTjrkvYesleZXHuJMc50nFqLwsSufORNJNG qT1Pw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=qlRG45EjJlal2WF7aU+9/tgzsKAWS4bXP2UgVB6or E8=; b=bQmL88kBAihgWzIY3H12/4gJfrhv6w7k1Y0ipDW+vrV0VFNxEbq/iDtlW ZysiPLetoHOfAkrUjkTQLDnNY9312leA9wR0sky/N/kyI5OfN6jt//3gkQwVPYKA aiO97tVvOEhQluuxixmO2CgGcoqGC8eJRwqw22hJeSkIJxalTMn5+1EcWFOyFqYp aeHMzobg6sWFRYxn0rNqz9+2yYBCaqpQj7zr/eQ6I26mUvLHInT9+JjP15a4pqx/ DA4eW5mLqwqxweDtB4IMXBrzhUpUEXb0OKaa3zRoBCaBin60l/jamx8PLNWRrTc7 mQDeEdkVkPOxkkwp5xSG8z6qvnINg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:HYZNXmjVkWubJSU0ipP8PF2qPpd5POkTDqLmKMYksS7guwlN_kZjyA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrkedtgdduvddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqh hmtdhhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhishhsrgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghlihhsshgrsegt ohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepudejfe drfeekrdduudejrdekvdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgr ihhlfhhrohhmpegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhn
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:HYZNXk2qH8Nnchnddik7de-RJ--bhKKCjZmBi5paQ67DFQIROaDLTQ> <xmx:HYZNXu8vW22YZsaC56DwsAPf0ZY6ZpXuC5AnmAKvny69KKp_1SP0eA> <xmx:HYZNXqMpEEYn8w-dTuZYylJ2XQNYGBB806pUuGwvXAoUy2bvtkFY3A> <xmx:HYZNXroFu-MLwNcHQZzyuUj1Kasr0__jea0wm0W7Ne5a26ddBts-qQ>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.82]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 337EA3060FD3; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:01:49 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR19MB31674AEC730A7DBEC2D2F015FC180@MN2PR19MB3167.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:01:50 -0500
Cc: Tarek Saad <tsaad=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte.all@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AEC87AD2-4E9D-424E-BAFE-4CE50F9455E8@cooperw.in>
References: <157650673758.21483.7390224855901982297@ietfa.amsl.com> <7E4C7DF8-7264-4871-A15A-13EFD123B5F2@juniper.net> <25d97422-cda1-1304-ef38-2bbde95eb73f@tenghardt.net> <MN2PR19MB31674AEC730A7DBEC2D2F015FC180@MN2PR19MB3167.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
To: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, Theresa Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/s7ZDvEdaCSUraQJu4yLcgOJPV0c>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte-07
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 19:01:54 -0000

Theresa, thanks for your review. Tarek, thanks for addressing Theresa’s comments. I entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa


> On Feb 11, 2020, at 2:57 PM, Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Theresa,
> 
> Thanks again for your feedback and confirmation.
> The document has been scheduled for a telechat. I accept your suggestion, and I'll hold your comment for the next update of the document.
> 
> Regards,
> Tarek
> 
> On 2/11/20, 12:23 PM, "Theresa Enghardt" <ietf@tenghardt.net> wrote:
> 
>    Hi Tarek,
> 
>    Thanks for the replies and the new revision, and sorry for the late
>    response.
> 
>    Your recent revision addresses most of my comments.
> 
>    Please find one further comment below:
> 
>    On 29.12.19 20:38, Tarek Saad wrote:
>> […]
>>    3.3
>>    "the PLR MUST ensure bypass tunnel assignment can satisfy the protected LSP MTU
>>    requirements post FRR" - Is there an existing mechanism to do this?
>> [TS]: Section 2.6 in RFC3209 describes a mechanism to determine whether a node should fragment or drop a packet that exceeds the Path MTU as discovered using RSVP signaling on primary LSP path. A PLR can leverage the RSVP discovered Path MTU on the backup and primary LSP path to ensure MTU is not exceeded after rerouting traffic on to the bypass tunnel.
> 
>    I think it'd be helpful to add a reference to that RFC and section here.
> 
>    Best,
>    Theresa
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art