Re: [mpls] Query regarding draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-p2mp-10

Subinoy Das <subinoy_das_82@yahoo.com> Fri, 06 August 2010 09:19 UTC

Return-Path: <subinoy_das_82@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D3923A6834 for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 02:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.281
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.281 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ayxnt+drto2T for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 02:19:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from n6-vm1.bullet.mail.in.yahoo.com (n6-vm1.bullet.mail.in.yahoo.com [202.86.4.133]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E49213A67FD for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 02:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [202.43.219.99] by n6.bullet.mail.in.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Aug 2010 09:19:45 -0000
Received: from [203.104.18.51] by t3.bullet.in.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Aug 2010 09:19:45 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp112.mail.in2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Aug 2010 09:19:45 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 733003.3668.bm@omp112.mail.in2.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 1344 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Aug 2010 09:19:45 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1281086385; bh=DCJtE8aztiZ4p4wwBaxWYZn/dUpgfz2sNwn0kUNL9Zo=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=iqlMuRnXrOMYFMRbkC+kTlDlL61zaujefKQqH7aTbThPFi20Ze36xiUOL8xL4Zm/qy+CKampZPmL1lMtx63nAHfP+o/nvKS5ZZhpCQc8/ASncDtQzJaAyQSngCdGP5hxHphpG76hW0xQ5Bbr7Bp3/IrDGDWo3wpBxPOh+OcQfwo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tyTTLeE0lojuKLfifSk1W4UI+4Scjxff+3BQD8AaRgMohlFwakPOhDJAZAanP5DwkhI5KGBO0Utnmo6ls/gpR4SzHZoda4OpHkVad7j2hIQBaSnNIS+Div6ZYm68cdNDM0UKbmwjMLyGD/vc8GMe8pO7xrf9cQRjGxlYwAu0saE=;
Message-ID: <623994.99267.qm@web95606.mail.in.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: 0pMFLJcVM1lHUmMo8xWKgP4raW3SJKNLbdmwzHW2vNq1Rxu GPC8l9s4tk0TKSmOiipnZLEJQk47_a_bsrWOeLKDOIaiww9QZ8nPc_2NYBp2 KXmSYEjl2rshIH0tjPn7wvhN0gU31a6YmTruc6um1QgP47Ze71XGhnUdwYS8 w7liso7t_RN.bcOAcnYzQGQTzES93bxle2XYkHHmY4sD4G0tVlAmdN3YpbxY N_jMIw4JKJ0VHPmkejjbG67PrbB8xOABhKk7yCPuNEBWdTd5bU7lPeBbu.KP e
Received: from [121.242.14.67] by web95606.mail.in.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:49:45 IST
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/459 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950
References: <954985.27508.qm@web95613.mail.in.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:49:45 +0530
From: Subinoy Das <subinoy_das_82@yahoo.com>
To: mpls@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <954985.27508.qm@web95613.mail.in.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1869786266-1281086385=:99267"
Subject: Re: [mpls] Query regarding draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-p2mp-10
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 09:19:20 -0000

Hi,

Can anyone please clarify my doubt? Or is there any other draft that can help 
me?

Regards,
Subinoy




________________________________
From: Subinoy Das <subinoy_das_82@yahoo.com>
To: mpls@ietf.org
Sent: Thu, 5 August, 2010 5:47:37 PM
Subject: [mpls] Query regarding draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-p2mp-10


Hi All,

From the draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-p2mp-10 it is not clear about the use of LDP MP 
Status TLV.
In section 12.  IANA considerations it says

   This document creates a new name space (the LDP MP Status Value
   Element type) that is to be managed by IANA, and the allocation of
   the value 1 for the type of MBB Status.

So, will it be used only for MBB?

Thanks,
Subinoy