Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
"Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com> Thu, 19 May 2016 14:39 UTC
Return-Path: <rgandhi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D2912D168; Thu, 19 May 2016 07:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cRxar-qSxUB8; Thu, 19 May 2016 07:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11C4C12D157; Thu, 19 May 2016 07:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1089; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1463668778; x=1464878378; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=79uv3B1AiqjA9FlZqccEvvlDgwMTXh271+OfdQjOyaU=; b=kMz0Nloo4DkIuM0QsbBkO60f0adOAjiCP96Y01B/l3ZQ9Uhq+HRcIk9f 0judByzRRRt9lr1VMpmQXE3N3bMXNVtfjG0hu337NzW1uhDOwOjOIvT9V T6Of5BUhTdM6r7mYYfbfPob94xhqIp0gh37QwZRBMcuJ6c0KH3el2UIFW g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AYAgAQzz1X/5xdJa1egzeBVAa6AgENgXWFAYEQAoE4OBQBAQEBAQEBZSeEQwEBBDoxAwsOAgIBCDYQGxclAgQBDQWIL8QmAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEdBYYghE2EEREBhVkcAQSYMQGOH4FphE+IYo9IAR4BAUKCOIE1boZRNn8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,334,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="103939541"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 May 2016 14:39:37 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com (xch-rcd-017.cisco.com [173.37.102.27]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4JEdbVg003809 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 19 May 2016 14:39:37 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com (173.36.7.28) by XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com (173.37.102.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 19 May 2016 09:39:36 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) by XCH-ALN-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Thu, 19 May 2016 09:39:36 -0500
From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
Thread-Index: AQHRsOxFiCpU9oC2VU+TbLJr3euQVJ/AZ2kA
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 14:39:36 +0000
Message-ID: <D36347EF.93131%rgandhi@cisco.com>
References: <729f6a0b-6222-7100-3b79-2291870d4421@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <729f6a0b-6222-7100-3b79-2291870d4421@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.2.150604
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.66.154]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <38DE0F6AF71F7249837CB84D380548E8@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/sIOf6Ilyewc1EDLSixgF_AlBvJc>
Cc: "draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org" <draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org>, "draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org" <draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 14:39:40 -0000
Hi Loa, Support (as a co-author) draft-saad-mpls-static-yang-03 draft-saad-mpls-base-yang-00 Thanks, Rakesh On 2016-05-18 6:01 AM, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu> wrote: > >Working Group, > >This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-saad-mpls-static- >yang-03 and draft-saad-mpls-base-yang-00 as MPLS working group >documents. > >Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working >group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical >motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that >the document should not be adopted as a working group document. > >There are no IPR disclosures against either document. An IPR poll has >been started in parallel to this adoption poll > >The working group adoption poll ends June 2, 2016, given that the IPR >poll has concluded. > >/Loa > >MPLS wg co-chair. >-- > > >Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com >Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu >Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt … Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- [mpls] 答复: poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Chenxia (D)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Tarek Saad (tsaad)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Shah, Himanshu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Wen, Bin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Raqib Jones
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Santosh Esale
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Loa Andersson