[mpls] draft-vasseur-ccamp-te-router-info-00.txt clarification needed.
Satyanarayana Dillikar <dsatya6@yahoo.com> Thu, 07 October 2004 01:16 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA06912; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 21:16:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFN2k-0001YS-HL; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 21:26:07 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CFMmJ-0005l0-9h; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 21:09:07 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CF7JK-0005s0-EO for mpls@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 04:38:10 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA02059 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 04:38:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web51103.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.38.145]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CF7Sl-0000mD-TN for mpls@ietf.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 04:47:57 -0400
Message-ID: <20041006083738.91829.qmail@web51103.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [203.126.136.220] by web51103.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 01:37:38 PDT
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 01:37:38 -0700
From: Satyanarayana Dillikar <dsatya6@yahoo.com>
To: mpls@ietf.org, mpls-ops@mplsrc.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8abaac9e10c826e8252866cbe6766464
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 21:09:05 -0400
Subject: [mpls] draft-vasseur-ccamp-te-router-info-00.txt clarification needed.
X-BeenThere: mpls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: mpls-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpls-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f
Hi, We have some confusion in understanding the Data Plane Capability Flags (B-bit & E-bit) from draft-vasseur-ccamp-te-router-info-00.txt (a) Does E-bit ON implies B-bit ON always ? (assuming ON = set and OFF = unset). (b) E-bit = ON & B-bit = OFF, is it a valid combination. (c) Please tell us the E-bit and B-bit status for a node which is a destination node but does not have branch capability. We are also curious to know (1)The idea behind combing two things (egress status & transit status) in a single E-bit. rather than making use of B-bit(branch) and having E-bit just for egress status. (2) Why the TE Node Capability Descriptor TLV should have E-bit & how it should be used in CSPF path computation. Thanks Satya _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- [mpls] draft-vasseur-ccamp-te-router-info-00.txt … Dillikar Satyanarayana-G19471
- [mpls] draft-vasseur-ccamp-te-router-info-00.txt … Satyanarayana Dillikar