Re: [mpls] MPLS-RT review of draft-hegde-mpls-spring-epe-oam

Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com> Tue, 18 February 2020 17:50 UTC

Return-Path: <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4C212085F; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:50:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.99
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.99 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ecitele.com header.b=WAZy3ti7; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=eci365.onmicrosoft.com header.b=DmKBRzUM
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aOM4ySQvIfkq; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:50:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.bemta26.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta26.messagelabs.com [85.158.142.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D574012086E; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:50:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ecitele.com; s=eciselector10072019; t=1582048199; i=@ecitele.com; bh=lix+/Std2QVi+fR77axc/rXr/2PtETLM+9w4HWssKSs=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=WAZy3ti76wNNmuI82N7yXEyxjz7f1tebN2aJ/obAIgJYWo9WQJxB8CVfvISEhofny XeFWr1jfo9p6L6OXFe/9UJ/Ti/70PIUFwkjolbIfL+blZEVBbzxfZo3Ck9u59KFcNd cF+s3GwReNCyqkxME9JQl0ipi2f7GPHIuryBWe3A=
Received: from [100.113.5.21] (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits)) by server-5.bemta.az-b.eu-central-1.aws.symcld.net id D7/AF-42406-6C32C4E5; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:49:58 +0000
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA1WTf0wbZRjHee+u5ZjUHC2MR+SXJfqH2NrKTAB FphgkDs3+kCwxrnClJ62Wo/SHKyA45pJl7bYw2BKlYMfW/erWZWyV4dZMsgADdI6wDZW4FBwY QAYraGAjTO963Zz/PPk8z/d53+/3kvdIXDovTiIZu5Uxs7RRLl5HSO/u6VT0ZxRrVLv8Cdmr4 36UPeyTZZ+5MSTOHjt6UrSRKNrZe1dU5PHcxzZjH4oMrLbKXibSf++5jZlcDXbHqB/fjtpYB1 pHIuooDr5gPyY0/QQM3umJFprzCAauNocbgvLhMPxgEucbKdWCwS/z32FCM4FgNXQGOVAMKab y4Nyp22Ke46kP4IKnMZpnnKqDls4FgmcZ9QbsOPwPIezkQ89SMFrgXDh5vQfjmaCeh+YTLhHP EoqG/vExkWC2D8FBz1z4QAylhb/n/eElRK2H5aHTmGCWCGOT7jADRYEncB0XOAFm7jyM7GshO NXBhSa5eTqsdRUIKykw4nZGxhngn94qjN8D5949SOCXYG7mtFhgE4T6BiNOL8CtxT5C4GQYWZ 1CfGSgugnu+v1hWylVDgNtS5GlVPDunSCakKr1idQCs7Cvd5poDX9+HAx+PUkIcxUs/OTGBc6 EYx1/Rvhl6PzrGnpyfghFe1GO1myo0FsraYNRoVapFGp1luJVhTorR0nXKrRKxqYoZ1irmeZU Jb3NorTUVJYbdUqWsZ5D3EPTVYuc3WjRt6C8gp4hMXmCZCWwSSN9Wlulq9HTFn2p2WZkLFdQM knKQULIizXSODNTwdg/Nhi55/pIBjJWHi+p52WJxURXWgwVgjSE8smmmfbDODl//whXQ14PV5 f5KiXYKpZJSpRAGneM4o/pbezjSx/9BiMoJUkmQVFRUdJYE2OuNFj/r8+iRBLJZZJTvHmsgbU +9p7lYmFcrAVZOJaV/k9K2o6tf3a5/KsGX+iP8eOpx6yXchqcm7Nits45zZYthS0XbZk3XZ+8 fs39peyzL6b7htc+cphJ39kfauplA8dtuUxcKflQV5/xlndT0LeUksbqigt0l7/d7TWmBwz6g 4E+afqPG7zB1ueacn4r/PmiqTvN1/x587sxeEm3aNZV+2kXm1aNun6/t3Shceds5lroTSpPX9 IQtTIUO9pyY6Kq6Hxbikq9UhrE3OOFT5Wkv/3+lsto8B1zlWijWDl1ItR+6Ei9wR+Isb+WP5w 4cNaUcqCUrqsTl12t/SahYIfj19z+DicVf6t69MGGKUf77t5tI6muxrxX9t/UaOLu7SpbTIgt T74kJyx6Wv0ibrbQ/wKDJ4DkgQQAAA==
X-Env-Sender: Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-238.messagelabs.com!1582048195!1466001!1
X-Originating-IP: [18.237.140.177]
X-SYMC-ESS-Client-Auth: mailfrom-relay-check=pass
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 9.44.25; banners=ecitele.com,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 24630 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2020 17:49:57 -0000
Received: from p01b.mail.dlp.protect.symantec.com (HELO mail.ds.dlp.protect.symantec.com) (18.237.140.177) by server-2.tower-238.messagelabs.com with ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted SMTP; 18 Feb 2020 17:49:57 -0000
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=jlSs8glvpPWu1jFcbT17fUyTplSDli6CplahRWmTBU65A+q/8RC4CD9O59i7yW06yebUcCqKZs4lRtmLSA2fHgv1WksVhDQkvJemNqthpxVJCijuNBg5hLDt6Qde9M7uTEFFWRfS4x7xZx+yUpxlxak4MoC7P4VJR5yoxHUT5Y9AJidTGYNfe+hXBTdu6Z7Fr5e6cp7E05LNH4vxfMUd0VrrpSIhZly2YI11bQCk8gnV/ImbEtB8xEhL2rYU6VgwblSKIfYHRa5YTt7mqsQ9V2i18SetLChRwz99Sq6J9qjY0ZSY0TusTDkcNXzJwruPm8MFrvpgkoKHH6fcYM7G1A==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=5ekxEOA+MtBuxVXkWLghK9G6l0opDB3btO2Mi5VlQRM=; b=UFcTC9UrZhaYLurnzmPZLgz6SF0okhWcznzqclmYUgsErewhx4Gkp7KJcb1JknCHir3POHINzkcsYhDNgPgcmy6NE9Le5l2BhtE1SN1SdTBEpUwTEZ3N+Qvw8M2IuqLdKAoA08wQtq5ttKk7yDdSYqz1QExWgDDYWLNKAsMpP/as2ZS28BiOXJFLTLzHl2Kc+nE5eF9tDmxeiCGgP/sNVE75ffTg7/s9F7Mpp7zt6jjfQuFMKekP7EnbvwOgIebAWgtgvtwyLp1U5RlMHkKZU4tcW/gBlyBFcX2eAU/7azEf2H+6fuE1Pe1cnQFj67hzHRvVcaV7PnETjt981gSShQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ecitele.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ecitele.com; dkim=pass header.d=ecitele.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ECI365.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-ECI365-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=5ekxEOA+MtBuxVXkWLghK9G6l0opDB3btO2Mi5VlQRM=; b=DmKBRzUMwZrB+B4U3tfeZ3JfXTQdsh9Z4pm/qqLZY7oIAzL2TNUkl/tjgkJsiIr7xc+L+Nc9ZSWgmB2YDltBztWfAzuXrcNgXMJam+V/0vuHWJ2bj8kcysl2CBkDeSkY6lsqx/JnTS5wysoEBpbjsLFfXmk87nqO3F/tSpSG6as=
Received: from AM0PR0302MB3217.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (52.133.33.12) by AM0PR0302MB3425.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (52.133.33.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2729.22; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:49:52 +0000
Received: from AM0PR0302MB3217.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::aca8:db6e:97b:c780]) by AM0PR0302MB3217.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::aca8:db6e:97b:c780%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2729.032; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:49:52 +0000
From: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
To: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
CC: "draft-hegde-mpls-spring-epe-oam@ietf.org" <draft-hegde-mpls-spring-epe-oam@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: MPLS-RT review of draft-hegde-mpls-spring-epe-oam
Thread-Index: AQHV4vKeSXSSwlbbs0eaHMYCIGuh5agg17LggABp31I=
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:49:52 +0000
Message-ID: <AM0PR0302MB32178A2BEB029EB95E5CD9E69D110@AM0PR0302MB3217.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <2141e262-752f-0c7e-fdcb-03aea45e9aa1@pi.nu>, <AM0PR0302MB32176103B4B465D86CF7C8C49D110@AM0PR0302MB3217.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR0302MB32176103B4B465D86CF7C8C49D110@AM0PR0302MB3217.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [79.182.99.98]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a7e04401-38ff-4660-03e3-08d7b49af531
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM0PR0302MB3425:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM0PR0302MB342594FF46B1FDA340A9F17C9D110@AM0PR0302MB3425.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273;
x-forefront-prvs: 031763BCAF
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(396003)(366004)(376002)(346002)(39860400002)(136003)(189003)(199004)(2940100002)(86362001)(71200400001)(8936002)(8676002)(81156014)(7696005)(81166006)(4326008)(66946007)(2906002)(76116006)(91956017)(110136005)(54906003)(26005)(66446008)(66556008)(64756008)(52536014)(66476007)(33656002)(186003)(316002)(9686003)(5660300002)(55016002)(478600001)(45080400002)(6506007)(53546011); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM0PR0302MB3425; H:AM0PR0302MB3217.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ecitele.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: B3jgS3IrHkyxeVNIKnVq6Y8kKd92eRikVzxBmCqj/xzwP8fhiErj8XuavvLJuBmIC6+8dC3hk3cCveqdsdyHe5v1DmJXL35zOi1ckBKVSQgsUJrXPvTDlLOoSUB+uOumfcHzew+NFrvJIe+20BJH6FtN5uabJRO+cuay5jnEYy32C3JnMfZJ8ExQSyjuhht7Mi2c1tUueH9ZcM8JxYJWxG+ca73ZyaY6cry6qkupx8cvVV5H8WrkZDprShunXg+wjKdhOWhNJLWk2y4O7W+FnnfA/WnPZOy68Ps9GNDurrSTb7HnUHM85Yn9uklSzv7tWJ+6cQX8K3AxZlIwACqetDt6w394sEzkqgcZGJ49bjLl+3MRoxQ5hsTDStjgxzHG2hhzc8sk0pqJHZFT7dhEwTEgE2ZkmaV6v27z3WnZ5jaAoQT5mHFxd2O2JQ0i+w8Y0pdDsFis1/RjHsXR05WImAQHV+/wkZ7dCsXlNhK+kEORg6Qi5ImsPQaKHhN1fhbwv+Q2s0gN3OGikouOmSzACw==
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: FM5fzwIzlkCoDye3BYE1hl7ebNZ2COzwwP12d1UsBhIBCJiPvGYPgHSGKTjPptReJz+zPm2IEc8+SCu8Pf7KNDMhJrHk3o562IJ5mrrvt8Nai78QY227WRAx/3H/dWRiHt2b3zHG+JvcRM19LPWM1w==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AM0PR0302MB32178A2BEB029EB95E5CD9E69D110AM0PR0302MB3217_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ecitele.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a7e04401-38ff-4660-03e3-08d7b49af531
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Feb 2020 17:49:52.6978 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2c514a61-08de-4519-b4c0-921fef62c42a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: gjXddFGQT5is2ueNXN6T0GuXShsni/4cJ8GjaX5r0XN2605LdtUI+vDCSyKoQft1dzQC+Wls6bzeDAgS5ITYkw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM0PR0302MB3425
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-DetectorID-Processed: d8d3a2b3-1594-4c39-92fb-b8312fe65a8a
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/sS_FBDpMT3ftcTJ8wixzaIm2_hk>
Subject: Re: [mpls] MPLS-RT review of draft-hegde-mpls-spring-epe-oam
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:50:07 -0000

Adding the MPLS WG list.

Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

________________________________
From: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2020, 14:04
To: mpls-chairs@ietf.org; Mach Chen
Cc: draft-hegde-mpls-spring-epe-oam@ietf.org
Subject: RE: MPLS-RT review of draft-hegde-mpls-spring-epe-oam


Hello,

I have been selected as one of the  MPLS-RT reviewers of draft-hegde-mpls-spring-epe-oam.



This review presumably is part of the process of adoption of this draft as an MPLS WG document, and should answer the following questions:

1.       Does this draft address a real problem?

2.       Is the current version a reasonably good start for solving this problem?

3.       Are there any issues that must be fixed prior to adoption of the draft as a WG document?



After reading the draft I think that the answers to questions (1) and (2) above are positive.



I have a couple of technical issues with the draft listed below.



1.       All sub-TLVs defined in the draft include lists of pair of local and remote IPv4 or IPv6 addresses describing links between the advertising node and the eBGP neighbor for which the EPE SID is advertised.

a.       I wonder if link-local IPv6 addresses are acceptable in these lists

b.       I also wonder how unnumbered P2P IPv4 interfaces could be specified in these lists.

2.       All sub-TLVs defined in the draft include, as one of their files the field “Local AS” that is always defined as ”4 octet unsigned integer representing the Member ASN inside the Confederation”. I wonder if this definition equally applies to the case when the so-called “Local AS” mechanism defined in RFC 7705<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7705> is used vs. a specific eBGP peer. In these scenarios the number of the AS to which the node that advertises an EPE SID differs from the AS number that this node uses in its OPEN message to the specific neighbor.

3.       The document states in Section 1 that “Other procedures for mpls ping and traceroute as defined in [RFC8287<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8287>] are applicable for EPE-SIDs as well”.

a.       Such a blank statement requires some clarification IMHO

b.       Specifically, RFC 8287 states in Section that the Traceroute initiator, upon receiving an MPLS Echo Reply message that includes the FEC Stack Change TLV with one or more of the original segments being popped “MAY remove a corresponding FEC(s) from the Target FEC          Stack TLV in the next (TTL+1) traceroute request”. I wonder if, in the case of EPE SIDs, MAY requirement should not be upgraded to SHOULD or even MUST for security reasons



Neither of the issues mentioned above looks to be as blocking WG adoption of the draft. They can safely be resolved after adoption.



Hopefully this review will be useful.



Regards,

Sasha



Office: +972-39266302

Cell:      +972-549266302

Email:   Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com



-----Original Message-----
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 6:53 AM
To: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>om>; Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>om>; Sam Aldrin <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com>om>; Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
Cc: draft-hegde-mpls-spring-epe-oam@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: MPLS-RT review of draft-hegde-mpls-spring-epe-oam



Mathew, Sam, Sasha and Italo,



You have be selected as MPLS-RT reviewers for draft-hegde-mpls-spring-epe-oam.



Note to authors: You have been CC'd on this email so that you can know that this review is going on. However, please do not review your own document.



Reviews should comment on whether the document is coherent, is it useful (ie, is it likely to be actually useful in operational networks), and is the document technically sound?  We are interested in knowing whether the document is ready to be considered for WG adoption (ie, it doesn't have to be perfect at this point, but should be a good start).



Reviews should be sent to the document authors, WG co-chairs and WG secretary, and CC'd to the MPLS WG email list. If necessary, comments may be sent privately to only the WG chairs.



If you have technical comments you should try to be explicit about what

*really* need to be resolved before adopting it as a working group document, and what can wait until the document is a working group document and the working group has the revision control.



Are you able to review this draft by Feb 28, 2020? Please respond in a timely fashion.





Thanks, Loa

(as MPLS WG chair)

--

--





Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu<mailto:loa@pi.nu>

Senior MPLS Expert

Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64


___________________________________________________________________________

This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is 
CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this 
transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original 
and all copies thereof.
___________________________________________________________________________