Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make draft-xu-mpls-in-udp an mpls working group document
"Pat Thaler" <pthaler@broadcom.com> Tue, 18 December 2012 23:56 UTC
Return-Path: <pthaler@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DD61F0CDF for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:56:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.727
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.727 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.871, BAYES_00=-2.599, CN_BODY_35=0.339, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_22=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_39=0.6, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XSlb9lgfm2ow for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:56:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mms3.broadcom.com (mms3.broadcom.com [216.31.210.19]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070C31F041A for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:56:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.16.192.224] by mms3.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom SMTP Relay (Email Firewall v6.5)); Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:51:07 -0800
X-Server-Uuid: B86B6450-0931-4310-942E-F00ED04CA7AF
Received: from SJEXCHCAS07.corp.ad.broadcom.com (10.16.203.17) by SJEXCHHUB01.corp.ad.broadcom.com (10.16.192.224) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.247.2; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:55:45 -0800
Received: from SJEXCHMB09.corp.ad.broadcom.com ( [fe80::3da7:665e:cc78:181f]) by SJEXCHCAS07.corp.ad.broadcom.com ( [::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:55:45 -0800
From: Pat Thaler <pthaler@broadcom.com>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make draft-xu-mpls-in-udp an mpls working group document
Thread-Index: Ac3deyKpJyfWUNRHQJy+hmEkKaWM6w==
Message-ID: <EB9B93801780FD4CA165E0FBCB3C3E671DF1D85E@SJEXCHMB09.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.16.203.100]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-WSS-ID: 7CCFDEE139W14061800-01-01
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_EB9B93801780FD4CA165E0FBCB3C3E671DF1D85ESJEXCHMB09corpa_"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:32:55 -0800
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make draft-xu-mpls-in-udp an mpls working group document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 23:56:06 -0000
X-Original-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 23:55:44 +0000
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 23:56:06 -0000
+1 Do not support Pat > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: mpls-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces at ietf.org] 代表 S. > Davari > 发送时间: 2012年12月15日 13:34 > 收件人: Loa Andersson > 抄送: draft-xu-mpls-in-udp at tools.ietf.org; mpls at ietf.org; > mpls-chairs at tools.ietf.org > 主题: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make draft-xu-mpls-in-udp an > mpls working group document > > I don't support this draft since it has no application in today's modern metro > and core, where MPLS is dominant, and its only practical application in in data > center, which already is crowded with other solutions such as NVGRE and > VXLAN. > > It seems the authors are trying to bypass the NVO3 solution selection process > by advancing the draft in MPLS WG. > > Regards, > Shahram > > > On Dec 14, 2012, at 1:01 AM, Loa Andersson <loa at pi.nu> wrote: > > > Working group, > > > > This is to start a "two week" poll on adopting > > draft-xu-mpls-in-udp-06 as an MPLS working group document. > > Due to the holiday season this poll has been extended with one week. > > > > Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working > > group mailing list (mpls at ietf.org) Please give an technical > > motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that > > the document should not be adopted as a working group document. > > > > This poll ends January 07, 2013. > > > > There is one IPR claim against this document - > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1941/ . > > > > All the active co-authors has stated on the working group mailing list > > that they are not aware of any other IPR claims than those already > > disclosed. > > > > However, up to version -03 (the document that we used for the IPR poll) > > Marshall Eubanks was listed as one of the authors. Marshall has > > discontinued all interactions with the IETF, including the author team > > of draft-xu-mpls-in-udp-06. The working group chairs has tried to > > contact Marshall by other means, to try get a response on the IPR poll. > > We have had no success in this. > > > > From version -04 the authors decided to remove Marshall as a co-author. > > > > /Loa > > (mpls wg co-chair) > > -- > > > > > > Loa Andersson email: > loa.andersson at ericsson.com > > Sr Strategy and Standards Manager loa at pi.nu > > Ericsson Inc phone: +46 10 717 52 13 > > +46 767 72 92 13 > > _______________________________________________ > > mpls mailing list > > mpls at ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls at ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make dra… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Vivek Kumar
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… S. Davari
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Kireeti Kompella
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Sam Aldrin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Nischal Sheth
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Puneet Agarwal
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Rogers, Josh
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Shane Amante
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Shane Amante
- [mpls] Discussion on how to transport MPLS over U… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Adrian Farrel
- [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlying n… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] Discussion on how to transport MPLS ov… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… S. Davari
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Pat Thaler
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… S. Davari
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lizhenbin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lizhong Jin
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Xuxiaohu
- [mpls] MPLS over L2TP over UDP//re: poll to see i… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Pat Thaler
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Pat Thaler
- [mpls] Poll ended - poll to see if we have suppor… Loa Andersson