Re: [mpls] IANA section of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Fri, 03 May 2013 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB01321F9722 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 May 2013 10:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cWwMi8OFhVvr for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 May 2013 10:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (unknown [83.168.239.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E12921F98A4 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 May 2013 09:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.104] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C8441802D36; Fri, 3 May 2013 18:50:53 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5183EAEF.8020100@pi.nu>
Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 18:50:55 +0200
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability@tools.ietf.org, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <51839D5B.5090108@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <51839D5B.5090108@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [mpls] IANA section of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 17:06:45 -0000

Folks,

I would like to amend my proposal to say:

  8. IANA Considerations

      This document defines a new LDP cpability parameter TLV. IANA is
      requested to assign the lowest available value after 0x0500 from
      "TLV Type  Name Space" in the "Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)
      Parameters"  registry within "Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)
      Name Spaces" as the new code point for the  LDP TLV code point .

  Range |  Description        | Reference     | Notes/Registration Date 
-------+---------------------+---------------+---------------------------
  tbd   | Application Control | This document |
        | Capability          |               | 
-------+---------------------+---------------+---------------------------


/Loa

On 2013-05-03 13:19, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Authors,
>
>
> I should have done this before, IANA sections is always tricky
> and need to be precise,
>
> The IANA section of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability-03.txt
> says:
>
> "8. IANA Considerations
>
>    The document defines a new capability parameter TLV and requests
>    following LDP TLV code point assignment by IANA from LDP "TLV Type
>    Name Space" registry:
>
>     o  "Application Control Capability" TLV (requested codepoint: 0x50C)"
>
> This is basically correct, but a few details need to be
> added. I would like to have it re-written as:
>
> 8. IANA Considerations
>
>     This document defines a new LDP cpability parameter. IANA is
>     requested to assign a new LDP TLV code point from "TLV Type
>     Name Space" in the "Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) Parameters"
>     registry within "Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) Name Spaces".
>
> Range |  Description        | Reference     | Notes/Registration Date
> ------+---------------------+---------------+---------------------------
> tbd   | Application Control | This document |
>        | Capability          |              |
> ------+---------------------+---------------+---------------------------
>
>
>
> Note 1: That naming structure is not good, I will talk to IANA to change it
> to something more intuitive.
>
> Note 2: "Range" is really "Value" or "Type", will check on the defining
> documents and talk to IANA to change it.

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64