IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: IPR poll for draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid

Liyan Gong <gongliyan@chinamobile.com> Tue, 30 July 2024 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <gongliyan@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D225C14F603; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 05:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B3XuiGqkk4J8; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 05:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta6.chinamobile.com [111.22.67.139]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00FE2C14F604; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 05:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[10.188.0.87]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app05-12005 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee566a8e095b22-c8b24; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 20:46:17 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee566a8e095b22-c8b24
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from gongliyan@chinamobile.com ( [10.1.6.52] ) by ajax-webmail-syy-spmd02-11012 (Richmail) with HTTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 20:46:17 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 20:46:17 +0800
From: Liyan Gong <gongliyan@chinamobile.com>
To: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-spri <draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <2b0466a8da9d969-0024d.Richmail.00005052853900802037@chinamobile.com>
References: <DS0PR19MB65015F0C6AE6EF72B1E7371FFC1A2@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>, <DS0PR19MB650135CA51A2F791C32751C4FCB02@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_114805_949630055.1722343577342"
X-Priority: 3
X-RM-TRANSID: 2b0466a8da9d969-0024d
Encrypt-Channel: web
X-RM-OA-ENC-TYPE: 0
X-RM-FontColor: 0
X-CLIENT-INFO: X-TIMING=0&X-MASSSENT=0&X-SENSITIVE=0
X-Mailer: Richmail_Webapp(V2.5.01)
Message-ID-Hash: LDNWHELMQYUUFW5RBQGP6R67OFTWA7FA
X-Message-ID-Hash: LDNWHELMQYUUFW5RBQGP6R67OFTWA7FA
X-MailFrom: gongliyan@chinamobile.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: MPLS Working Chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: IPR poll for draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/seseOGhOK3b1mklzsqCtsLJt7rY>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Tarek and WG,



As a co-author, I am not aware of any relevant IPR.



Best Regards,

Liyan





----邮件原文----发件人：Tarek Saad  <tsaad.net@gmail.com>收件人："mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>,"draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid@ietf.org>抄　送: MPLS Working Chairs  <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>发送时间：2024-07-30 11:55:29主题：IPR poll for draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid
    


Working Group, authors,


 


We are preparing draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid for the Working Group last call.


This mail starts the IPR poll.


 


Are you aware of any IPR that applies to this document?


If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?


 


Currently, there are no IPR disclosures filed against draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid.


 


If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.


 


**The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list.** 


 


The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor. 


If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.


 


Regards, 


Tarek (as MPLS WG chair)

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status