Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
Raqib Jones <raqib@Brocade.com> Wed, 01 June 2016 15:52 UTC
Return-Path: <raqib@Brocade.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0451412B026; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 08:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P_hJJfWYWP_6; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 08:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-000f0801.pphosted.com (mx0a-000f0801.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:7a::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BC3112D099; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 08:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0048193.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-000f0801.pphosted.com (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u51FhS5g013001; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 08:52:34 -0700
Received: from hq1wp-exmb12.corp.brocade.com ([144.49.131.13]) by mx0a-000f0801.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 237a253v3m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 01 Jun 2016 08:52:34 -0700
Received: from HQ1WP-EXMB12.corp.brocade.com (10.70.20.186) by HQ1WP-EXMB12.corp.brocade.com (10.70.20.186) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1156.6; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 08:52:33 -0700
Received: from HQ1WP-EXMB12.corp.brocade.com ([fe80::b5c6:be43:7d72:632d]) by HQ1WP-EXMB12.corp.brocade.com ([fe80::b5c6:be43:7d72:632d%20]) with mapi id 15.00.1156.000; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 08:52:33 -0700
From: Raqib Jones <raqib@Brocade.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
Thread-Index: AQHRsOxENlJdVWIOe0iJrKI3ZsVEKp/U2Ugg
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 15:52:33 +0000
Message-ID: <469dd6d85f2744d5a07e74e747b69a81@HQ1WP-EXMB12.corp.brocade.com>
References: <729f6a0b-6222-7100-3b79-2291870d4421@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <729f6a0b-6222-7100-3b79-2291870d4421@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.252.130.7]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-06-01_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1604210000 definitions=main-1606010176
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/sfz_sk3yi1wIxffe0Rz17vsVFf0>
Cc: "draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org" <draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org>, "draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org" <draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 15:52:37 -0000
Support both, Thanks, - Raqib -----Original Message----- From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.nu] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 3:01 AM To: mpls@ietf.org Cc: draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org; draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org Subject: poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base) Working Group, This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-saad-mpls-static- yang-03 and draft-saad-mpls-base-yang-00 as MPLS working group documents. Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that the document should not be adopted as a working group document. There are no IPR disclosures against either document. An IPR poll has been started in parallel to this adoption poll The working group adoption poll ends June 2, 2016, given that the IPR poll has concluded. /Loa MPLS wg co-chair. -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt … Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- [mpls] 答复: poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Chenxia (D)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Tarek Saad (tsaad)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Shah, Himanshu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Wen, Bin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Raqib Jones
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Santosh Esale
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Loa Andersson