Re: [mpls] poll on making draft-jjwl-mpls-mldp-hsmp-01.txt a mpls wg document

Dear WG,

Being a co-author I obviously support this draft.

My reasons for supporting this draft;

A HSMP LSP provides an upstream path to the root, associated with a specific downstream path, without the need for additional overlay procedures. This is good for applications that require co-routed up and downstream paths. There has been some discussion whether or not the use-cases in this draft are strong enough, IMO this is a good toolkit to have in the mLDP box and I'm sure other use-cases will follow later. 

Thx,

Ice.

On 04 Sep 2012, at 08:16, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:

> Working group,
> 
> this is to start a two week poll on adopting
> draft-jjwl-mpls-mldp-hsmp-01.txt
> as an MPLS working group document.
> 
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org)
> 
> This poll is extended and will end Sep 19th, 2012.
> 
> /Loa
> (mpls wg co-chair)
> -- 
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                         email: loa.andersson@ericsson.com
> Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            loa@pi.nu
> Ericsson Inc                          phone: +46 10 717 52 13
>                                             +46 767 72 92 13
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 